All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hector.oron@gmail.com (Hector Oron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i.MX multi SoC patches
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:03:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAODfWeFeaw2+xe01c5fiSr1tYsdM8J8ahZz8t-B7uuD+-P0GCQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314172987-10349-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

Hello Sascha,

2011/8/24 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
> This is hopefully the last iteration of the patches for compiling
> all ARMv4/v5 based i.MXs together. CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> lost its experimental status and we can still build uImages
> even with CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR enabled. This series selects
> these options and makes a multi SoC image the default.
> Also, we can now build all i.MX5 SoCs into a single image.
> This series also updates the defconfigs.

Thanks very much for doing this work, it is very much appreciated.
I have not yet been able to test this work at runtime, but I have
attempted to compile
your branch 'imx-features' which seems to keep all this work. I have
noticed a name
clashing producing the following compile time error:

arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-pata_imx.c:33: error:
?MX51_INT_ATA? undeclared here (not in a function)

Lurking a bit in the archive I noticed that Uwe patch
<http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106633/> it is assumed, but not applied.
Attached there is a refreshed patch which applies to your 'imx-features' branch.

With kind regards,
-- 
?H?ctor Or?n ?-.. . -... .. .- -. ? -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ARM-mx5-fix-remaining-unconsistent-names-for-irqs-v2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 8976 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110825/506838f5/attachment-0001.bin>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-24  8:03 Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5 " Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM i.MX5: update defconfig Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24  8:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM i.MX defconfigs: use one defconfig for all ARMv4/v5 SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 23:03 ` Hector Oron [this message]
2011-08-25  6:38   ` i.MX multi SoC patches Sascha Hauer
2011-08-25 11:44   ` hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:44     ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:52     ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-25 12:55   ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 14:16     ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-08-25 14:54     ` Sascha Hauer
2011-08-31 13:02 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-31 14:05   ` Shawn Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAODfWeFeaw2+xe01c5fiSr1tYsdM8J8ahZz8t-B7uuD+-P0GCQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hector.oron@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --subject='Re: i.MX multi SoC patches' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.