From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hector.oron@gmail.com (Hector Oron) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:03:55 +0200 Subject: i.MX multi SoC patches In-Reply-To: <1314172987-10349-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> References: <1314172987-10349-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Sascha, 2011/8/24 Sascha Hauer : > This is hopefully the last iteration of the patches for compiling > all ARMv4/v5 based i.MXs together. CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT > lost its experimental status and we can still build uImages > even with CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR enabled. This series selects > these options and makes a multi SoC image the default. > Also, we can now build all i.MX5 SoCs into a single image. > This series also updates the defconfigs. Thanks very much for doing this work, it is very much appreciated. I have not yet been able to test this work at runtime, but I have attempted to compile your branch 'imx-features' which seems to keep all this work. I have noticed a name clashing producing the following compile time error: arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-pata_imx.c:33: error: ?MX51_INT_ATA? undeclared here (not in a function) Lurking a bit in the archive I noticed that Uwe patch it is assumed, but not applied. Attached there is a refreshed patch which applies to your 'imx-features' branch. With kind regards, -- ?H?ctor Or?n ?-.. . -... .. .- -. ? -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ARM-mx5-fix-remaining-unconsistent-names-for-irqs-v2.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 8976 bytes Desc: not available URL: