On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:21 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:02:38AM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> >     >     > +#define virtio_net_config virtio_net_config_with_rss
> >     >
> >     >     Do we have to? Let's just tweak code to do the right thing...
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Are we going to update the virtio_net some time?
> >     > If yes, IMO makes sense to do less tweaking in the middle of the
> code.
> >     > Then, upon update of virtio_net.h - easily remove all these
> defines that
> >     were
> >     > added in virtio-net.c
> >
> >     We'll update it in a month or two. But I'd be reluctant to merge
> hacks
> >     since people tend to copy-paste code ...
> >
> >
> > I agree that merging hacks is very bad practice.
> > Which change is more looks like a hack: redefine the struct to its _real_
> > layout or change the type of the struct in 5 places?
>
> Anything that would be unacceptable as a permanent solution is a hack.
> In this case how about
>         virtio_net_config_rss {
>                 struct virtio_net_config config;
>                 /* RSS things */
>         }
>

No problem.

'#define virtio_net_config virtio_net_config_with_rss ' is OK?



>
>
> --
> MST
>
>