All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] *dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
@ 2022-05-04 20:34 Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: " Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8) Jason Ekstrand
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-04 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel
  Cc: Daniel Stone, Michel Dänzer, wayland-devel, Jason Ekstrand,
	Dave Airlie, mesa-dev, Christian König

Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit synchronization
model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the implicit synchronization used
in the kernel and assumed by X11 and Wayland.  The client -> compositor half
of the synchronization isn't too bad, at least on intel, because we can
control whether or not i915 synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's
considered written.

The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get the
buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to provide the
client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point in time where the
window system (compositor and/or display) finished using the buffer.  With
current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such a way that we don't get
confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the buffer.  In particular, once we
tell the kernel that we're rendering to the buffer again, any CPU waits on the
buffer or GPU dependencies will wait on some of the client rendering and not
just the compositor.

This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of the
implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a sync file.
It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only, instead of CPU
waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at the current moment in
time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it later.  As long as the Vulkan
driver does the sync_file export from the dma-buf before we re-introduce it
for rendering, it will only contain fences from the compositor or display.
This allows to accurately turn it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any
over-synchronization.

This patch series actually contains two new ioctls.  There is the export one
mentioned above as well as an RFC for an import ioctl which provides the other
half.  The intention is to land the export ioctl since it seems like there's
no real disagreement on that one.  The import ioctl, however, has a lot of
debate around it so it's intended to be RFC-only for now.

Mesa MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/4037
IGT tests: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/90490/

v10 (Jason Ekstrand, Daniel Vetter):
 - Add reviews/acks
 - Add a patch to rename _rcu to _unlocked
 - Split things better so import is clearly RFC status

v11 (Daniel Vetter):
 - Add more CCs to try and get maintainers
 - Add a patch to document DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC
 - Generally better docs
 - Use separate structs for import/export (easier to document)
 - Fix an issue in the import patch

v12 (Daniel Vetter):
 - Better docs for DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC

v12 (Christian König):
 - Drop the rename patch in favor of Christian's series
 - Add a comment to the commit message for the dma-buf sync_file export
   ioctl saying why we made it an ioctl on dma-buf

v13 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework

Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Jason Ekstrand (2):
  dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8)

 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h |  57 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+)

-- 
2.36.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-04 20:34 [PATCH 0/2] *dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13) Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-04 20:34 ` Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-04 22:49   ` Daniel Vetter
  2022-05-05  6:25   ` Christian König
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8) Jason Ekstrand
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-04 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel
  Cc: Christian König, Jason Ekstrand, Daniel Vetter, Sumit Semwal

Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.

The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.

This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.

By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
hard to reach.

v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
   when importing an exclusive fence.

v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
 - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
 - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file

v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper

v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
 - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence

v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
   as useful as import.
 - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
 - Rework the commit message

v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Require at least one sync flag
 - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
 - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only

v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
 - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)

v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Add documentation for the new ioctl

v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name

v11 (Daniel Vetter):
 - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
 - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do

v12 (Christian König):
 - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf

v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/sync_file.h>
 #include <linux/poll.h>
 #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
  * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective fences, i.e. the
  * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
  * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
+ *
+ * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
+ * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
  */
 
 static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
@@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
+static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+				     void __user *user_data)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
+	enum dma_resv_usage usage;
+	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
+	struct sync_file *sync_file;
+	int fd, ret;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return fd;
+
+	usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
+						   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
+	ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_put_fd;
+
+	if (!fence)
+		fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
+
+	sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
+
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+	if (!sync_file) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_put_fd;
+	}
+
+	fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
+
+	arg.fd = fd;
+	if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_put_fd:
+	put_unused_fd(fd);
+	return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
 static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 			  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
 		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
+	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
+		return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
+#endif
+
 	default:
 		return -ENOTTY;
 	}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
 
 #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN	32
 
+/**
+ * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
+ *
+ * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve the
+ * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.  CPU
+ * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait on
+ * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
+ * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on the
+ * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
+ * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an explicit
+ * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
+ */
+struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
+	/**
+	 * @flags: Read/write flags
+	 *
+	 * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
+	 *
+	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
+	 * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
+	 * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
+	 * poll() with POLLIN.
+	 *
+	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
+	 * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
+	 * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
+	 * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
+	 * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
+	 */
+	__u32 flags;
+	/** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
+	__s32 fd;
+};
+
 #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
 #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
 
@@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
+#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
 
 #endif
-- 
2.36.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8)
  2022-05-04 20:34 [PATCH 0/2] *dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13) Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: " Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-04 20:34 ` Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-04 22:53   ` Daniel Vetter
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-04 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Christian König, Jason Ekstrand, Sumit Semwal

This patch is analogous to the previous sync file export patch in that
it allows you to import a sync_file into a dma-buf.  Unlike the previous
patch, however, this does add genuinely new functionality to dma-buf.
Without this, the only way to attach a sync_file to a dma-buf is to
submit a batch to your driver of choice which waits on the sync_file and
claims to write to the dma-buf.  Even if said batch is a no-op, a submit
is typically way more overhead than just attaching a fence.  A submit
may also imply extra synchronization with other work because it happens
on a hardware queue.

In the Vulkan world, this is useful for dealing with the out-fence from
vkQueuePresent.  Current Linux window-systems (X11, Wayland, etc.) all
rely on dma-buf implicit sync.  Since Vulkan is an explicit sync API, we
get a set of fences (VkSemaphores) in vkQueuePresent and have to stash
those as an exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf.  We handle it in
Mesa today with the above mentioned dummy submit trick.  This ioctl
would allow us to set it directly without the dummy submit.

This may also open up possibilities for GPU drivers to move away from
implicit sync for their kernel driver uAPI and instead provide sync
files and rely on dma-buf import/export for communicating with other
implicit sync clients.

We make the explicit choice here to only allow setting RW fences which
translates to an exclusive fence on the dma_resv.  There's no use for
read-only fences for communicating with other implicit sync userspace
and any such attempts are likely to be racy at best.  When we got to
insert the RW fence, the actual fence we set as the new exclusive fence
is a combination of the sync_file provided by the user and all the other
fences on the dma_resv.  This ensures that the newly added exclusive
fence will never signal before the old one would have and ensures that
we don't break any dma_resv contracts.  We require userspace to specify
RW in the flags for symmetry with the export ioctl and in case we ever
want to support read fences in the future.

There is one downside here that's worth documenting:  If two clients
writing to the same dma-buf using this API race with each other, their
actions on the dma-buf may happen in parallel or in an undefined order.
Both with and without this API, the pattern is the same:  Collect all
the fences on dma-buf, submit work which depends on said fences, and
then set a new exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf which depends on
said work.  The difference is that, when it's all handled by the GPU
driver's submit ioctl, the three operations happen atomically under the
dma_resv lock.  If two userspace submits race, one will happen before
the other.  You aren't guaranteed which but you are guaranteed that
they're strictly ordered.  If userspace manages the fences itself, then
these three operations happen separately and the two render operations
may happen genuinely in parallel or get interleaved.  However, this is a
case of userspace racing with itself.  As long as we ensure userspace
can't back the kernel into a corner, it should be fine.

v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
   when importing an exclusive fence.

v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
 - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
 - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file

v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper

v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
 - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence

v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Split import and export into separate patches
 - New commit message

v7 (Daniel Vetter):
 - Fix the uapi header to use the right struct in the ioctl
 - Use a separate dma_buf_import_sync_file struct
 - Add kerneldoc for dma_buf_import_sync_file

v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 529e0611e53b..68aac6f694f9 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -383,6 +383,40 @@ static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
 	put_unused_fd(fd);
 	return ret;
 }
+
+static long dma_buf_import_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+				     const void __user *user_data)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_import_sync_file arg;
+	struct dma_fence *fence;
+	enum dma_resv_usage usage;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	fence = sync_file_get_fence(arg.fd);
+	if (!fence)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
+						   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
+
+	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
+
+	ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(dmabuf->resv, 1);
+	if (!ret)
+		dma_resv_add_fence(dmabuf->resv, fence, usage);
+
+	dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
+
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+	return ret;
+}
 #endif
 
 static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
@@ -431,6 +465,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
 	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
 		return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
+	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE:
+		return dma_buf_import_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void __user *)arg);
 #endif
 
 	default:
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
index 46f1e3e98b02..913119bf2201 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -119,6 +119,27 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
 	__s32 fd;
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct dma_buf_import_sync_file - Insert a sync_file into a dma-buf
+ *
+ * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE to insert a
+ * sync_file into a dma-buf for the purposes of implicit synchronization
+ * with other dma-buf consumers.  This allows clients using explicitly
+ * synchronized APIs such as Vulkan to inter-op with dma-buf consumers
+ * which expect implicit synchronization such as OpenGL or most media
+ * drivers/video.
+ */
+struct dma_buf_import_sync_file {
+	/**
+	 * @flags: Read/write flags
+	 *
+	 * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW.
+	 */
+	__u32 flags;
+	/** @fd: Sync file descriptor */
+	__s32 fd;
+};
+
 #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
 #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
 
@@ -129,5 +150,6 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
 #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
+#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3, struct dma_buf_import_sync_file)
 
 #endif
-- 
2.36.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: " Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-04 22:49   ` Daniel Vetter
  2022-05-05  8:05     ` Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-05  6:25   ` Christian König
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2022-05-04 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Ekstrand
  Cc: dri-devel, Christian König, Daniel Vetter, Sumit Semwal

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:03PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
> synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
> implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
> Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
> bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
> synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.
> 
> The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
> the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
> provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
> in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
> using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
> a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
> buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
> the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
> wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.
> 
> This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
> the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
> sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
> instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
> the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
> later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
> dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
> fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
> it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.
> 
> By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
> functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
> having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
> code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
> hard to reach.
> 
> v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
>    when importing an exclusive fence.
> 
> v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
>  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
>  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> 
> v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> 
> v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
>  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> 
> v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
>    as useful as import.
>  - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
>  - Rework the commit message
> 
> v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Require at least one sync flag
>  - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
>  - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only
> 
> v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
>  - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> 
> v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Add documentation for the new ioctl
> 
> v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> 
> v11 (Daniel Vetter):
>  - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
>  - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do
> 
> v12 (Christian König):
>  - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf
> 
> v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Not sure which version it was that I reviewed, but with dma_resv_usage
this all looks neat and tidy. One nit below.

> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
>  #include <linux/poll.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
> @@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>   * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective fences, i.e. the
>   * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
>   * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
> + *
> + * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
> + * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
>   */
>  
>  static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> @@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> +static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> +				     void __user *user_data)
> +{
> +	struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
> +	enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> +	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> +	struct sync_file *sync_file;
> +	int fd, ret;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;

We allow userspace to set both SYNC_READ and SYNC_WRITE here, I think

	if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
		return -EINVAL;

is missing?

Also maybe a case to add to your igt.

> +
> +	fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> +	if (fd < 0)
> +		return fd;
> +
> +	usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> +						   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> +	ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_put_fd;
> +
> +	if (!fence)
> +		fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> +
> +	sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> +
> +	dma_fence_put(fence);
> +
> +	if (!sync_file) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_put_fd;
> +	}
> +
> +	fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> +
> +	arg.fd = fd;
> +	if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_put_fd:
> +	put_unused_fd(fd);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
>  			  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
>  	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
>  		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> +	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> +		return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
> +#endif
> +
>  	default:
>  		return -ENOTTY;
>  	}
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
>  
>  #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN	32
>  
> +/**
> + * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
> + *
> + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve the
> + * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.  CPU
> + * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait on
> + * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
> + * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on the
> + * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
> + * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an explicit
> + * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
> + */
> +struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> +	/**
> +	 * @flags: Read/write flags
> +	 *
> +	 * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
> +	 *
> +	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
> +	 * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
> +	 * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
> +	 * poll() with POLLIN.
> +	 *
> +	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
> +	 * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
> +	 * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
> +	 * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
> +	 * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
> +	 */
> +	__u32 flags;
> +	/** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
> +	__s32 fd;
> +};
> +
>  #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
>  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
>  
> @@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
>  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
>  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
>  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)

With the one nit fixed for this version:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.36.0
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8)
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8) Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-04 22:53   ` Daniel Vetter
  2022-05-05  8:13     ` Jason Ekstrand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2022-05-04 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Ekstrand
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Christian König, dri-devel, Sumit Semwal

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This patch is analogous to the previous sync file export patch in that
> it allows you to import a sync_file into a dma-buf.  Unlike the previous
> patch, however, this does add genuinely new functionality to dma-buf.
> Without this, the only way to attach a sync_file to a dma-buf is to
> submit a batch to your driver of choice which waits on the sync_file and
> claims to write to the dma-buf.  Even if said batch is a no-op, a submit
> is typically way more overhead than just attaching a fence.  A submit
> may also imply extra synchronization with other work because it happens
> on a hardware queue.
> 
> In the Vulkan world, this is useful for dealing with the out-fence from
> vkQueuePresent.  Current Linux window-systems (X11, Wayland, etc.) all
> rely on dma-buf implicit sync.  Since Vulkan is an explicit sync API, we
> get a set of fences (VkSemaphores) in vkQueuePresent and have to stash
> those as an exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf.  We handle it in
> Mesa today with the above mentioned dummy submit trick.  This ioctl
> would allow us to set it directly without the dummy submit.
> 
> This may also open up possibilities for GPU drivers to move away from
> implicit sync for their kernel driver uAPI and instead provide sync
> files and rely on dma-buf import/export for communicating with other
> implicit sync clients.
> 
> We make the explicit choice here to only allow setting RW fences which
> translates to an exclusive fence on the dma_resv.  There's no use for
> read-only fences for communicating with other implicit sync userspace
> and any such attempts are likely to be racy at best.  When we got to
> insert the RW fence, the actual fence we set as the new exclusive fence
> is a combination of the sync_file provided by the user and all the other
> fences on the dma_resv.  This ensures that the newly added exclusive
> fence will never signal before the old one would have and ensures that
> we don't break any dma_resv contracts.  We require userspace to specify
> RW in the flags for symmetry with the export ioctl and in case we ever
> want to support read fences in the future.
> 
> There is one downside here that's worth documenting:  If two clients
> writing to the same dma-buf using this API race with each other, their
> actions on the dma-buf may happen in parallel or in an undefined order.
> Both with and without this API, the pattern is the same:  Collect all
> the fences on dma-buf, submit work which depends on said fences, and
> then set a new exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf which depends on
> said work.  The difference is that, when it's all handled by the GPU
> driver's submit ioctl, the three operations happen atomically under the
> dma_resv lock.  If two userspace submits race, one will happen before
> the other.  You aren't guaranteed which but you are guaranteed that
> they're strictly ordered.  If userspace manages the fences itself, then
> these three operations happen separately and the two render operations
> may happen genuinely in parallel or get interleaved.  However, this is a
> case of userspace racing with itself.  As long as we ensure userspace
> can't back the kernel into a corner, it should be fine.
> 
> v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
>    when importing an exclusive fence.
> 
> v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
>  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
>  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> 
> v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> 
> v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
>  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> 
> v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Split import and export into separate patches
>  - New commit message
> 
> v7 (Daniel Vetter):
>  - Fix the uapi header to use the right struct in the ioctl
>  - Use a separate dma_buf_import_sync_file struct
>  - Add kerneldoc for dma_buf_import_sync_file
> 
> v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
>  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 529e0611e53b..68aac6f694f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,40 @@ static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>  	put_unused_fd(fd);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +static long dma_buf_import_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> +				     const void __user *user_data)
> +{
> +	struct dma_buf_import_sync_file arg;
> +	struct dma_fence *fence;
> +	enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)

I think the flag validation here looks wrong? I think needs needs the
exact same 3 checks as the export ioctl.

> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	fence = sync_file_get_fence(arg.fd);
> +	if (!fence)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> +						   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> +
> +	dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> +
> +	ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(dmabuf->resv, 1);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		dma_resv_add_fence(dmabuf->resv, fence, usage);
> +
> +	dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
> +
> +	dma_fence_put(fence);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> @@ -431,6 +465,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
>  	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
>  		return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
> +	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> +		return dma_buf_import_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void __user *)arg);
>  #endif
>  
>  	default:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> index 46f1e3e98b02..913119bf2201 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,27 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
>  	__s32 fd;
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct dma_buf_import_sync_file - Insert a sync_file into a dma-buf
> + *
> + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE to insert a
> + * sync_file into a dma-buf for the purposes of implicit synchronization
> + * with other dma-buf consumers.  This allows clients using explicitly
> + * synchronized APIs such as Vulkan to inter-op with dma-buf consumers
> + * which expect implicit synchronization such as OpenGL or most media
> + * drivers/video.
> + */
> +struct dma_buf_import_sync_file {
> +	/**
> +	 * @flags: Read/write flags
> +	 *
> +	 * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW.

The checks are wrong, but the intent of your implementation looks a lot
more like you allow both SYNC_WRITE and SYNC_READ, and I think that makes
a lot of sense. Especially since we can now true sync-less access for vk
with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEPING, so allowing userspace to explicit set
read will be needed.

Or does vk only allow you to set write fences anyway? That would suck for
the vk app + gl compositor case a bit, so I hope not.

> +	 */
> +	__u32 flags;
> +	/** @fd: Sync file descriptor */
> +	__s32 fd;
> +};
> +
>  #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
>  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
>  
> @@ -129,5 +150,6 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
>  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
>  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
>  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3, struct dma_buf_import_sync_file)

With the flag nits sorted out:

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 2.36.0
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: " Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-04 22:49   ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2022-05-05  6:25   ` Christian König
  2022-05-05  8:10     ` Jason Ekstrand
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2022-05-05  6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Ekstrand, dri-devel; +Cc: Sumit Semwal, Daniel Vetter

Am 04.05.22 um 22:34 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
> synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
> implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
> Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
> bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
> synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.
>
> The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
> the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
> provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
> in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
> using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
> a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
> buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
> the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
> wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.
>
> This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
> the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
> sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
> instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
> the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
> later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
> dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
> fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
> it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.
>
> By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
> functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
> having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
> code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
> hard to reach.
>
> v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
>     when importing an exclusive fence.
>
> v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
>   - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
>   - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
>
> v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
>
> v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
>   - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
>
> v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
>     as useful as import.
>   - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
>   - Rework the commit message
>
> v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Require at least one sync flag
>   - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
>   - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only
>
> v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
>   - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
>
> v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Add documentation for the new ioctl
>
> v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
>
> v11 (Daniel Vetter):
>   - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
>   - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do
>
> v12 (Christian König):
>   - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf
>
> v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
>   - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>   #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
>   #include <linux/poll.h>
>   #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
>   #include <linux/mm.h>
> @@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>    * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective fences, i.e. the
>    * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
>    * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
> + *
> + * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
> + * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
>    */
>   
>   static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> @@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> +static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> +				     void __user *user_data)
> +{
> +	struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
> +	enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> +	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> +	struct sync_file *sync_file;
> +	int fd, ret;
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> +	if (fd < 0)
> +		return fd;
> +
> +	usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> +						   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> +	ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_put_fd;
> +
> +	if (!fence)
> +		fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> +
> +	sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> +
> +	dma_fence_put(fence);
> +
> +	if (!sync_file) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_put_fd;
> +	}
> +
> +	fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> +
> +	arg.fd = fd;
> +	if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> +		return -EFAULT;

I know we had that discussion before, but I'm not 100% any more what the 
outcome was.

The problem here is that when the copy_to_user fails we have a file 
descriptor which is valid, but userspace doesn't know anything about it.

I only see a few possibilities here:
1. Keep it like this and just assume that a process which you can't copy 
the fd to is also dying (a bit to much assumption for my taste).

2. Close the file descriptor when this happens (not ideal either).

3. Instead of returning the fd in the parameter structure return it as 
IOCTL result.

Number 3 is what drm_prime_handle_to_fd_ioctl() is doing as well and 
IIRC we said that this is probably the best option.

Apart from that the patch set looks really clean to me now.

Regards,
Christian.


> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_put_fd:
> +	put_unused_fd(fd);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   			  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>   {
> @@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
>   		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
>   
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> +	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> +		return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
> +#endif
> +
>   	default:
>   		return -ENOTTY;
>   	}
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
>   
>   #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN	32
>   
> +/**
> + * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
> + *
> + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve the
> + * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.  CPU
> + * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait on
> + * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
> + * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on the
> + * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
> + * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an explicit
> + * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
> + */
> +struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> +	/**
> +	 * @flags: Read/write flags
> +	 *
> +	 * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
> +	 *
> +	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
> +	 * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
> +	 * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
> +	 * poll() with POLLIN.
> +	 *
> +	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
> +	 * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
> +	 * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
> +	 * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
> +	 * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
> +	 */
> +	__u32 flags;
> +	/** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
> +	__s32 fd;
> +};
> +
>   #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
>   #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
>   
> @@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
>   #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
>   #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
>   #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
>   
>   #endif


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-04 22:49   ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2022-05-05  8:05     ` Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-05  8:23       ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-05  8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter
  Cc: Maling list - DRI developers, Christian König,
	Daniel Vetter, Sumit Semwal

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11169 bytes --]

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:49 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:03PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
> > synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
> > implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
> > Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
> > bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
> > synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.
> >
> > The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
> > the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
> > provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
> > in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
> > using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
> > a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
> > buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
> > the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
> > wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.
> >
> > This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
> > the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
> > sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
> > instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
> > the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
> > later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
> > dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
> > fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
> > it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.
> >
> > By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
> > functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
> > having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
> > code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
> > hard to reach.
> >
> > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> >    when importing an exclusive fence.
> >
> > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> >  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> >  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> >
> > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> >
> > v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
> >  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> >
> > v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
> >    as useful as import.
> >  - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
> >  - Rework the commit message
> >
> > v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Require at least one sync flag
> >  - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
> >  - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only
> >
> > v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
> >  - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> >
> > v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Add documentation for the new ioctl
> >
> > v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> >
> > v11 (Daniel Vetter):
> >  - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> >  - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do
> >
> > v12 (Christian König):
> >  - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf
> >
> > v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> Not sure which version it was that I reviewed, but with dma_resv_usage
> this all looks neat and tidy. One nit below.
>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> >  #include <linux/poll.h>
> >  #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> >  #include <linux/mm.h>
> > @@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file,
> loff_t offset, int whence)
> >   * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective fences,
> i.e. the
> >   * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
> >   * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
> > + *
> > + * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
> > + * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
> >   */
> >
> >  static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct
> dma_fence_cb *cb)
> > @@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf
> *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > +static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > +                                  void __user *user_data)
> > +{
> > +     struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
> > +     enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> > +     struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > +     struct sync_file *sync_file;
> > +     int fd, ret;
> > +
> > +     if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +     if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
>
> We allow userspace to set both SYNC_READ and SYNC_WRITE here, I think
>
>         if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> is missing?
>

We could, but I don't really get why we should disallow that.  SYNC_READ |
SYNC_WRITE is the same as SYNC_WRITE and that seems like perfectly sane
behavior to me.

--Jason


> Also maybe a case to add to your igt.
>
> > +
> > +     fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > +     if (fd < 0)
> > +             return fd;
> > +
> > +     usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> > +                                                DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> > +     ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > +
> > +     if (!fence)
> > +             fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> > +
> > +     sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> > +
> > +     dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +
> > +     if (!sync_file) {
> > +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> > +
> > +     arg.fd = fd;
> > +     if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +
> > +err_put_fd:
> > +     put_unused_fd(fd);
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >                         unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >  {
> > @@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >       case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
> >               return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > +     case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > +             return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user
> *)arg);
> > +#endif
> > +
> >       default:
> >               return -ENOTTY;
> >       }
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> >
> >  #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN     32
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
> > + *
> > + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve
> the
> > + * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.
> CPU
> > + * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait
> on
> > + * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
> > + * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on
> the
> > + * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
> > + * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an
> explicit
> > + * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
> > + */
> > +struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> > +     /**
> > +      * @flags: Read/write flags
> > +      *
> > +      * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
> > +      *
> > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
> > +      * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
> > +      * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
> > +      * poll() with POLLIN.
> > +      *
> > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
> > +      * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
> > +      * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
> > +      * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
> > +      * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
> > +      */
> > +     __u32 flags;
> > +     /** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
> > +     __s32 fd;
> > +};
> > +
> >  #define DMA_BUF_BASE         'b'
> >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> >
> > @@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME     _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
> >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
> >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2,
> struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
>
> With the one nit fixed for this version:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> >
> >  #endif
> > --
> > 2.36.0
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13982 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-05  6:25   ` Christian König
@ 2022-05-05  8:10     ` Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-05  8:27       ` Christian König
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-05  8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian König
  Cc: Sumit Semwal, Maling list - DRI developers, Daniel Vetter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11928 bytes --]

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:25 AM Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
wrote:

> Am 04.05.22 um 22:34 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> > Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
> > synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
> > implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
> > Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
> > bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
> > synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.
> >
> > The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
> > the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
> > provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
> > in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
> > using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
> > a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
> > buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
> > the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
> > wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.
> >
> > This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
> > the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
> > sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
> > instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
> > the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
> > later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
> > dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
> > fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
> > it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.
> >
> > By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
> > functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
> > having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
> > code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
> > hard to reach.
> >
> > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> >     when importing an exclusive fence.
> >
> > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> >   - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> >   - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> >
> > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> >
> > v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
> >   - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> >
> > v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
> >     as useful as import.
> >   - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
> >   - Rework the commit message
> >
> > v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Require at least one sync flag
> >   - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
> >   - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only
> >
> > v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
> >   - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> >
> > v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Add documentation for the new ioctl
> >
> > v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> >
> > v11 (Daniel Vetter):
> >   - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> >   - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do
> >
> > v12 (Christian König):
> >   - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf
> >
> > v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >   - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> >   #include <linux/module.h>
> >   #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> >   #include <linux/poll.h>
> >   #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> >   #include <linux/mm.h>
> > @@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file,
> loff_t offset, int whence)
> >    * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective
> fences, i.e. the
> >    * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
> >    * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
> > + *
> > + * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
> > + * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
> >    */
> >
> >   static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct
> dma_fence_cb *cb)
> > @@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf
> *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > +static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > +                                  void __user *user_data)
> > +{
> > +     struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
> > +     enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> > +     struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > +     struct sync_file *sync_file;
> > +     int fd, ret;
> > +
> > +     if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +     if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > +     if (fd < 0)
> > +             return fd;
> > +
> > +     usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> > +                                                DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> > +     ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > +
> > +     if (!fence)
> > +             fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> > +
> > +     sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> > +
> > +     dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +
> > +     if (!sync_file) {
> > +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> > +
> > +     arg.fd = fd;
> > +     if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
>
> I know we had that discussion before, but I'm not 100% any more what the
> outcome was.
>
> The problem here is that when the copy_to_user fails we have a file
> descriptor which is valid, but userspace doesn't know anything about it.
>
> I only see a few possibilities here:
> 1. Keep it like this and just assume that a process which you can't copy
> the fd to is also dying (a bit to much assumption for my taste).
>
> 2. Close the file descriptor when this happens (not ideal either).
>
> 3. Instead of returning the fd in the parameter structure return it as
> IOCTL result.
>
> Number 3 is what drm_prime_handle_to_fd_ioctl() is doing as well and
> IIRC we said that this is probably the best option.
>

I don't have a strong preference here, so I'll go with whatever in the end
but let me at least explain my reasoning.  First, this was based on the FD
import/export in syncobj which stuffs the FD in the args struct.  If
`copy_to_user` is a problem here, it's a problem there as well.  Second,
the only way `copy_to_user` can fail is if the client gives us a read-only
page or somehow manages to race removing the page from their address space
(via unmap(), for instance) with this ioctl.  Both of those seem like
pretty serious client errors to me.  That, or the client is in the process
of dying, in which case we really don't care.

--Jason



> Apart from that the patch set looks really clean to me now.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +
> > +err_put_fd:
> > +     put_unused_fd(fd);
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >                         unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >   {
> > @@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >       case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
> >               return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > +     case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > +             return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user
> *)arg);
> > +#endif
> > +
> >       default:
> >               return -ENOTTY;
> >       }
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> >
> >   #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN    32
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
> > + *
> > + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve
> the
> > + * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.
> CPU
> > + * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait
> on
> > + * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
> > + * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on
> the
> > + * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
> > + * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an
> explicit
> > + * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
> > + */
> > +struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> > +     /**
> > +      * @flags: Read/write flags
> > +      *
> > +      * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
> > +      *
> > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
> > +      * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
> > +      * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
> > +      * poll() with POLLIN.
> > +      *
> > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
> > +      * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
> > +      * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
> > +      * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
> > +      * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
> > +      */
> > +     __u32 flags;
> > +     /** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
> > +     __s32 fd;
> > +};
> > +
> >   #define DMA_BUF_BASE                'b'
> >   #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC  _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> >
> > @@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> >   #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME    _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
> >   #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A  _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
> >   #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B  _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2,
> struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> >
> >   #endif
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14659 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8)
  2022-05-04 22:53   ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2022-05-05  8:13     ` Jason Ekstrand
  2022-05-05  8:39       ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-05  8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Christian König,
	Maling list - DRI developers, Sumit Semwal

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9754 bytes --]

On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:53 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > This patch is analogous to the previous sync file export patch in that
> > it allows you to import a sync_file into a dma-buf.  Unlike the previous
> > patch, however, this does add genuinely new functionality to dma-buf.
> > Without this, the only way to attach a sync_file to a dma-buf is to
> > submit a batch to your driver of choice which waits on the sync_file and
> > claims to write to the dma-buf.  Even if said batch is a no-op, a submit
> > is typically way more overhead than just attaching a fence.  A submit
> > may also imply extra synchronization with other work because it happens
> > on a hardware queue.
> >
> > In the Vulkan world, this is useful for dealing with the out-fence from
> > vkQueuePresent.  Current Linux window-systems (X11, Wayland, etc.) all
> > rely on dma-buf implicit sync.  Since Vulkan is an explicit sync API, we
> > get a set of fences (VkSemaphores) in vkQueuePresent and have to stash
> > those as an exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf.  We handle it in
> > Mesa today with the above mentioned dummy submit trick.  This ioctl
> > would allow us to set it directly without the dummy submit.
> >
> > This may also open up possibilities for GPU drivers to move away from
> > implicit sync for their kernel driver uAPI and instead provide sync
> > files and rely on dma-buf import/export for communicating with other
> > implicit sync clients.
> >
> > We make the explicit choice here to only allow setting RW fences which
> > translates to an exclusive fence on the dma_resv.  There's no use for
> > read-only fences for communicating with other implicit sync userspace
> > and any such attempts are likely to be racy at best.  When we got to
> > insert the RW fence, the actual fence we set as the new exclusive fence
> > is a combination of the sync_file provided by the user and all the other
> > fences on the dma_resv.  This ensures that the newly added exclusive
> > fence will never signal before the old one would have and ensures that
> > we don't break any dma_resv contracts.  We require userspace to specify
> > RW in the flags for symmetry with the export ioctl and in case we ever
> > want to support read fences in the future.
> >
> > There is one downside here that's worth documenting:  If two clients
> > writing to the same dma-buf using this API race with each other, their
> > actions on the dma-buf may happen in parallel or in an undefined order.
> > Both with and without this API, the pattern is the same:  Collect all
> > the fences on dma-buf, submit work which depends on said fences, and
> > then set a new exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf which depends on
> > said work.  The difference is that, when it's all handled by the GPU
> > driver's submit ioctl, the three operations happen atomically under the
> > dma_resv lock.  If two userspace submits race, one will happen before
> > the other.  You aren't guaranteed which but you are guaranteed that
> > they're strictly ordered.  If userspace manages the fences itself, then
> > these three operations happen separately and the two render operations
> > may happen genuinely in parallel or get interleaved.  However, this is a
> > case of userspace racing with itself.  As long as we ensure userspace
> > can't back the kernel into a corner, it should be fine.
> >
> > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> >    when importing an exclusive fence.
> >
> > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> >  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> >  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> >
> > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> >
> > v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
> >  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> >
> > v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Split import and export into separate patches
> >  - New commit message
> >
> > v7 (Daniel Vetter):
> >  - Fix the uapi header to use the right struct in the ioctl
> >  - Use a separate dma_buf_import_sync_file struct
> >  - Add kerneldoc for dma_buf_import_sync_file
> >
> > v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
> >  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > index 529e0611e53b..68aac6f694f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > @@ -383,6 +383,40 @@ static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf
> *dmabuf,
> >       put_unused_fd(fd);
> >       return ret;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static long dma_buf_import_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > +                                  const void __user *user_data)
> > +{
> > +     struct dma_buf_import_sync_file arg;
> > +     struct dma_fence *fence;
> > +     enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> > +     int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +     if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > +             return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +     if (arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
>
> I think the flag validation here looks wrong? I think needs needs the
> exact same 3 checks as the export ioctl.
>

Yup.  Fixed.  By which I mean I stuck in the 2-check version.  Let's chat
on patch 1 about whether or not RW should be allowed.


>
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     fence = sync_file_get_fence(arg.fd);
> > +     if (!fence)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> > +                                                DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> > +
> > +     dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> > +
> > +     ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(dmabuf->resv, 1);
> > +     if (!ret)
> > +             dma_resv_add_fence(dmabuf->resv, fence, usage);
> > +
> > +     dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
> > +
> > +     dma_fence_put(fence);
> > +
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> >  #endif
> >
> >  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > @@ -431,6 +465,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> >       case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> >               return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user
> *)arg);
> > +     case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > +             return dma_buf_import_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void __user
> *)arg);
> >  #endif
> >
> >       default:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > index 46f1e3e98b02..913119bf2201 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > @@ -119,6 +119,27 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> >       __s32 fd;
> >  };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct dma_buf_import_sync_file - Insert a sync_file into a dma-buf
> > + *
> > + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE to insert a
> > + * sync_file into a dma-buf for the purposes of implicit synchronization
> > + * with other dma-buf consumers.  This allows clients using explicitly
> > + * synchronized APIs such as Vulkan to inter-op with dma-buf consumers
> > + * which expect implicit synchronization such as OpenGL or most media
> > + * drivers/video.
> > + */
> > +struct dma_buf_import_sync_file {
> > +     /**
> > +      * @flags: Read/write flags
> > +      *
> > +      * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW.
>
> The checks are wrong, but the intent of your implementation looks a lot
> more like you allow both SYNC_WRITE and SYNC_READ, and I think that makes
> a lot of sense. Especially since we can now true sync-less access for vk
> with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEPING, so allowing userspace to explicit set
> read will be needed.
>
> Or does vk only allow you to set write fences anyway? That would suck for
> the vk app + gl compositor case a bit, so I hope not.
>

I just forgot to update the docs.  The reason for only allowing RW before
was because we were all scared of inserting shared fences and not exclusive
fences.  Now that we have the fence rework, I think being able to stick in
a read fence is safe.  Not sure if it's useful, but it's at least safe.

--Jason


> > +      */
> > +     __u32 flags;
> > +     /** @fd: Sync file descriptor */
> > +     __s32 fd;
> > +};
> > +
> >  #define DMA_BUF_BASE         'b'
> >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> >
> > @@ -129,5 +150,6 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
> >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2,
> struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3,
> struct dma_buf_import_sync_file)
>
> With the flag nits sorted out:
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> >
> >  #endif
> > --
> > 2.36.0
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12178 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-05  8:05     ` Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-05  8:23       ` Daniel Vetter
  2022-05-06  0:11         ` Jason Ekstrand
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2022-05-05  8:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Ekstrand
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Maling list - DRI developers,
	Christian König, Sumit Semwal

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:05:44AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:49 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:03PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
> > > synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
> > > implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
> > > Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
> > > bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
> > > synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.
> > >
> > > The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
> > > the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
> > > provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
> > > in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
> > > using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
> > > a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
> > > buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
> > > the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
> > > wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.
> > >
> > > This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
> > > the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
> > > sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
> > > instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
> > > the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
> > > later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
> > > dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
> > > fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
> > > it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.
> > >
> > > By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
> > > functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
> > > having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
> > > code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
> > > hard to reach.
> > >
> > > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> > >    when importing an exclusive fence.
> > >
> > > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> > >  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> > >  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> > >
> > > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> > >
> > > v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
> > >  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> > >
> > > v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
> > >    as useful as import.
> > >  - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
> > >  - Rework the commit message
> > >
> > > v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Require at least one sync flag
> > >  - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
> > >  - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only
> > >
> > > v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
> > >  - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > >
> > > v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Add documentation for the new ioctl
> > >
> > > v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> > >
> > > v11 (Daniel Vetter):
> > >  - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> > >  - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do
> > >
> > > v12 (Christian König):
> > >  - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf
> > >
> > > v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > > Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> > > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >
> > Not sure which version it was that I reviewed, but with dma_resv_usage
> > this all looks neat and tidy. One nit below.
> >
> > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > >  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > > +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> > >  #include <linux/poll.h>
> > >  #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> > >  #include <linux/mm.h>
> > > @@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file,
> > loff_t offset, int whence)
> > >   * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective fences,
> > i.e. the
> > >   * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
> > >   * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
> > > + *
> > > + * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
> > > + * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
> > >   */
> > >
> > >  static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct
> > dma_fence_cb *cb)
> > > @@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
> > >       return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > > +static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > > +                                  void __user *user_data)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
> > > +     enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> > > +     struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > > +     struct sync_file *sync_file;
> > > +     int fd, ret;
> > > +
> > > +     if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +     if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +     if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> >
> > We allow userspace to set both SYNC_READ and SYNC_WRITE here, I think
> >
> >         if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> > is missing?
> >
> 
> We could, but I don't really get why we should disallow that.  SYNC_READ |
> SYNC_WRITE is the same as SYNC_WRITE and that seems like perfectly sane
> behavior to me.

Yeah, but it's resulting in some really confusing semantics:

- SYNC_WRITE gives you the write fences
- SYNC_READ gives you the read fences _and_ the write fences
- SYNC_WRITE | SYNC_READ gives you only the write fences

Someone will get this wrong. Also pondering some more we reuse the sync
flags from the cpu flush helpers, and there you need to set them for the
access you're about to do. And that's also how all the drivers use, which
means maybe the more natural meaning if these flags would be:

- SYNC_WRITE | SYNC_READ (or just SYNC_WRITE) gives you both read and
  write fences, since those are the fences you need to wait on before you
  start writing
- SYNC_READ only gives you the read fence

This is also what Christian implemented in the dma_resv_usage_rw() helper
for implicit sync.
-Daniel

> 
> --Jason
> 
> 
> > Also maybe a case to add to your igt.
> >
> > > +
> > > +     fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > > +     if (fd < 0)
> > > +             return fd;
> > > +
> > > +     usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> > > +                                                DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> > > +     ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
> > > +     if (ret)
> > > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > > +
> > > +     if (!fence)
> > > +             fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> > > +
> > > +     sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> > > +
> > > +     dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > +
> > > +     if (!sync_file) {
> > > +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> > > +
> > > +     arg.fd = fd;
> > > +     if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +
> > > +err_put_fd:
> > > +     put_unused_fd(fd);
> > > +     return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > >                         unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > >       case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
> > >               return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
> > >
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > > +     case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > > +             return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user
> > *)arg);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >       default:
> > >               return -ENOTTY;
> > >       }
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > @@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> > >
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN     32
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
> > > + *
> > > + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve
> > the
> > > + * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.
> > CPU
> > > + * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait
> > on
> > > + * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
> > > + * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on
> > the
> > > + * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
> > > + * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an
> > explicit
> > > + * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
> > > + */
> > > +struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> > > +     /**
> > > +      * @flags: Read/write flags
> > > +      *
> > > +      * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
> > > +      *
> > > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
> > > +      * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
> > > +      * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
> > > +      * poll() with POLLIN.
> > > +      *
> > > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
> > > +      * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
> > > +      * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
> > > +      * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
> > > +      * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
> > > +      */
> > > +     __u32 flags;
> > > +     /** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
> > > +     __s32 fd;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_BASE         'b'
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> > >
> > > @@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME     _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> > > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2,
> > struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> >
> > With the one nit fixed for this version:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >
> > >
> > >  #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.36.0
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> >

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-05  8:10     ` Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-05  8:27       ` Christian König
  2022-05-05  8:35         ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2022-05-05  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Ekstrand; +Cc: Sumit Semwal, Maling list - DRI developers, Daniel Vetter

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2220 bytes --]

Am 05.05.22 um 10:10 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:25 AM Christian König 
> <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>
>     [SNIP]
>     > +     fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
>     > +
>     > +     arg.fd = fd;
>     > +     if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
>     > +             return -EFAULT;
>
>     I know we had that discussion before, but I'm not 100% any more
>     what the
>     outcome was.
>
>     The problem here is that when the copy_to_user fails we have a file
>     descriptor which is valid, but userspace doesn't know anything
>     about it.
>
>     I only see a few possibilities here:
>     1. Keep it like this and just assume that a process which you
>     can't copy
>     the fd to is also dying (a bit to much assumption for my taste).
>
>     2. Close the file descriptor when this happens (not ideal either).
>
>     3. Instead of returning the fd in the parameter structure return
>     it as
>     IOCTL result.
>
>     Number 3 is what drm_prime_handle_to_fd_ioctl() is doing as well and
>     IIRC we said that this is probably the best option.
>
>
> I don't have a strong preference here, so I'll go with whatever in the 
> end but let me at least explain my reasoning.  First, this was based 
> on the FD import/export in syncobj which stuffs the FD in the args 
> struct.  If `copy_to_user` is a problem here, it's a problem there as 
> well.  Second, the only way `copy_to_user` can fail is if the client 
> gives us a read-only page or somehow manages to race removing the page 
> from their address space (via unmap(), for instance) with this ioctl.  
> Both of those seem like pretty serious client errors to me.  That, or 
> the client is in the process of dying, in which case we really don't care.

Yeah, I know about that copy_to_user() issue in the syncobj and also 
some driver specific handling.

That's why we discussed this before and IIRC somebody indeed ran into an 
issue with -EFAULT and that was the reason all this bubbled up.

I don't have a strong preference either, but I think we should try to 
learn from previous mistakes and design new interfaces based on such 
experience.

Christian.

>
> --Jason
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3914 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-05  8:27       ` Christian König
@ 2022-05-05  8:35         ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2022-05-05  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christian König
  Cc: Maling list - DRI developers, Jason Ekstrand, Daniel Vetter,
	Sumit Semwal

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:27:39AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 05.05.22 um 10:10 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:25 AM Christian König
> > <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> > 
> >     [SNIP]
> >     > +     fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> >     > +
> >     > +     arg.fd = fd;
> >     > +     if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> >     > +             return -EFAULT;
> > 
> >     I know we had that discussion before, but I'm not 100% any more
> >     what the
> >     outcome was.
> > 
> >     The problem here is that when the copy_to_user fails we have a file
> >     descriptor which is valid, but userspace doesn't know anything
> >     about it.
> > 
> >     I only see a few possibilities here:
> >     1. Keep it like this and just assume that a process which you
> >     can't copy
> >     the fd to is also dying (a bit to much assumption for my taste).
> > 
> >     2. Close the file descriptor when this happens (not ideal either).
> > 
> >     3. Instead of returning the fd in the parameter structure return
> >     it as
> >     IOCTL result.
> > 
> >     Number 3 is what drm_prime_handle_to_fd_ioctl() is doing as well and
> >     IIRC we said that this is probably the best option.
> > 
> > 
> > I don't have a strong preference here, so I'll go with whatever in the
> > end but let me at least explain my reasoning.  First, this was based on
> > the FD import/export in syncobj which stuffs the FD in the args struct. 
> > If `copy_to_user` is a problem here, it's a problem there as well. 
> > Second, the only way `copy_to_user` can fail is if the client gives us a
> > read-only page or somehow manages to race removing the page from their
> > address space (via unmap(), for instance) with this ioctl.  Both of
> > those seem like pretty serious client errors to me.  That, or the client
> > is in the process of dying, in which case we really don't care.
> 
> Yeah, I know about that copy_to_user() issue in the syncobj and also some
> driver specific handling.
> 
> That's why we discussed this before and IIRC somebody indeed ran into an
> issue with -EFAULT and that was the reason all this bubbled up.
> 
> I don't have a strong preference either, but I think we should try to learn
> from previous mistakes and design new interfaces based on such experience.

We have this in a bunch of places (like execbuf tail handling after
drm_sched_job_push()) and I think what we commonly do is just try to clean
up the mess a bit and fail.

I think what you could do here is do the copy_to_user before you do the
fd_install, and if the copy_to_user fails you just clean up everything and
fail. That just means there's a small window where userspace has an fd
reserve that didn't end up being used, but also in real apps this just
never matters.

Leaking the fd is maybe not the best option, but meh.
-Daniel

> 
> Christian.
> 
> > 
> > --Jason
> > 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8)
  2022-05-05  8:13     ` Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-05  8:39       ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2022-05-05  8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Ekstrand
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Maling list - DRI developers,
	Christian König, Sumit Semwal

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:13:55AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:53 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > This patch is analogous to the previous sync file export patch in that
> > > it allows you to import a sync_file into a dma-buf.  Unlike the previous
> > > patch, however, this does add genuinely new functionality to dma-buf.
> > > Without this, the only way to attach a sync_file to a dma-buf is to
> > > submit a batch to your driver of choice which waits on the sync_file and
> > > claims to write to the dma-buf.  Even if said batch is a no-op, a submit
> > > is typically way more overhead than just attaching a fence.  A submit
> > > may also imply extra synchronization with other work because it happens
> > > on a hardware queue.
> > >
> > > In the Vulkan world, this is useful for dealing with the out-fence from
> > > vkQueuePresent.  Current Linux window-systems (X11, Wayland, etc.) all
> > > rely on dma-buf implicit sync.  Since Vulkan is an explicit sync API, we
> > > get a set of fences (VkSemaphores) in vkQueuePresent and have to stash
> > > those as an exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf.  We handle it in
> > > Mesa today with the above mentioned dummy submit trick.  This ioctl
> > > would allow us to set it directly without the dummy submit.
> > >
> > > This may also open up possibilities for GPU drivers to move away from
> > > implicit sync for their kernel driver uAPI and instead provide sync
> > > files and rely on dma-buf import/export for communicating with other
> > > implicit sync clients.
> > >
> > > We make the explicit choice here to only allow setting RW fences which
> > > translates to an exclusive fence on the dma_resv.  There's no use for
> > > read-only fences for communicating with other implicit sync userspace
> > > and any such attempts are likely to be racy at best.  When we got to
> > > insert the RW fence, the actual fence we set as the new exclusive fence
> > > is a combination of the sync_file provided by the user and all the other
> > > fences on the dma_resv.  This ensures that the newly added exclusive
> > > fence will never signal before the old one would have and ensures that
> > > we don't break any dma_resv contracts.  We require userspace to specify
> > > RW in the flags for symmetry with the export ioctl and in case we ever
> > > want to support read fences in the future.
> > >
> > > There is one downside here that's worth documenting:  If two clients
> > > writing to the same dma-buf using this API race with each other, their
> > > actions on the dma-buf may happen in parallel or in an undefined order.
> > > Both with and without this API, the pattern is the same:  Collect all
> > > the fences on dma-buf, submit work which depends on said fences, and
> > > then set a new exclusive (write) fence on the dma-buf which depends on
> > > said work.  The difference is that, when it's all handled by the GPU
> > > driver's submit ioctl, the three operations happen atomically under the
> > > dma_resv lock.  If two userspace submits race, one will happen before
> > > the other.  You aren't guaranteed which but you are guaranteed that
> > > they're strictly ordered.  If userspace manages the fences itself, then
> > > these three operations happen separately and the two render operations
> > > may happen genuinely in parallel or get interleaved.  However, this is a
> > > case of userspace racing with itself.  As long as we ensure userspace
> > > can't back the kernel into a corner, it should be fine.
> > >
> > > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> > >    when importing an exclusive fence.
> > >
> > > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> > >  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> > >  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> > >
> > > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> > >
> > > v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
> > >  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> > >
> > > v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Split import and export into separate patches
> > >  - New commit message
> > >
> > > v7 (Daniel Vetter):
> > >  - Fix the uapi header to use the right struct in the ioctl
> > >  - Use a separate dma_buf_import_sync_file struct
> > >  - Add kerneldoc for dma_buf_import_sync_file
> > >
> > > v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > >  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > index 529e0611e53b..68aac6f694f9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > @@ -383,6 +383,40 @@ static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf
> > *dmabuf,
> > >       put_unused_fd(fd);
> > >       return ret;
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +static long dma_buf_import_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > > +                                  const void __user *user_data)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct dma_buf_import_sync_file arg;
> > > +     struct dma_fence *fence;
> > > +     enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> > > +     int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > +     if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +     if (arg.flags != DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> >
> > I think the flag validation here looks wrong? I think needs needs the
> > exact same 3 checks as the export ioctl.
> >
> 
> Yup.  Fixed.  By which I mean I stuck in the 2-check version.  Let's chat
> on patch 1 about whether or not RW should be allowed.
> 
> 
> >
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +     fence = sync_file_get_fence(arg.fd);
> > > +     if (!fence)
> > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +     usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> > > +                                                DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> > > +
> > > +     dma_resv_lock(dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> > > +
> > > +     ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(dmabuf->resv, 1);
> > > +     if (!ret)
> > > +             dma_resv_add_fence(dmabuf->resv, fence, usage);
> > > +
> > > +     dma_resv_unlock(dmabuf->resv);
> > > +
> > > +     dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > +
> > > +     return ret;
> > > +}
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > >  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > > @@ -431,6 +465,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > >       case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > >               return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user
> > *)arg);
> > > +     case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > > +             return dma_buf_import_sync_file(dmabuf, (const void __user
> > *)arg);
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > >       default:
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > index 46f1e3e98b02..913119bf2201 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > @@ -119,6 +119,27 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> > >       __s32 fd;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * struct dma_buf_import_sync_file - Insert a sync_file into a dma-buf
> > > + *
> > > + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE to insert a
> > > + * sync_file into a dma-buf for the purposes of implicit synchronization
> > > + * with other dma-buf consumers.  This allows clients using explicitly
> > > + * synchronized APIs such as Vulkan to inter-op with dma-buf consumers
> > > + * which expect implicit synchronization such as OpenGL or most media
> > > + * drivers/video.
> > > + */
> > > +struct dma_buf_import_sync_file {
> > > +     /**
> > > +      * @flags: Read/write flags
> > > +      *
> > > +      * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW.
> >
> > The checks are wrong, but the intent of your implementation looks a lot
> > more like you allow both SYNC_WRITE and SYNC_READ, and I think that makes
> > a lot of sense. Especially since we can now true sync-less access for vk
> > with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEPING, so allowing userspace to explicit set
> > read will be needed.
> >
> > Or does vk only allow you to set write fences anyway? That would suck for
> > the vk app + gl compositor case a bit, so I hope not.
> >
> 
> I just forgot to update the docs.  The reason for only allowing RW before
> was because we were all scared of inserting shared fences and not exclusive
> fences.  Now that we have the fence rework, I think being able to stick in
> a read fence is safe.  Not sure if it's useful, but it's at least safe.

For compositors we do need to be able to insert read fences, or things go
wrong I think with concurrency with apps and readback. If the compositor
marks its access as writing, then you stall the client when it wants to
copy stuff over to the next buffer or do some temporal post processing or
whatever. Or do we just entirely rely on winsys events for handing the
buffers back? I'm honestly not sure on this part ... and there's probably
some buffer sharing where these read fences do matter.
-Daniel

> 
> --Jason
> 
> 
> > > +      */
> > > +     __u32 flags;
> > > +     /** @fd: Sync file descriptor */
> > > +     __s32 fd;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_BASE         'b'
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
> > >
> > > @@ -129,5 +150,6 @@ struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> > >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2,
> > struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> > > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_IMPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 3,
> > struct dma_buf_import_sync_file)
> >
> > With the flag nits sorted out:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> >
> > >
> > >  #endif
> > > --
> > > 2.36.0
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> >

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-05  8:23       ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2022-05-06  0:11         ` Jason Ekstrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-06  0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter
  Cc: Maling list - DRI developers, Christian König,
	Daniel Vetter, Sumit Semwal

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13620 bytes --]

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 3:23 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:05:44AM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:49 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 03:34:03PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > > Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
> > > > synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
> > > > implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
> > > > Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't
> too
> > > > bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
> > > > synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered
> written.
> > > >
> > > > The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we
> get
> > > > the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
> > > > provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the
> point
> > > > in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
> > > > using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in
> such
> > > > a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
> > > > buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering
> to
> > > > the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies
> will
> > > > wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.
> > > >
> > > > This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot
> of
> > > > the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of
> a
> > > > sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT
> only,
> > > > instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation,
> at
> > > > the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
> > > > later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from
> the
> > > > dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
> > > > fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately
> turn
> > > > it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.
> > > >
> > > > By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
> > > > functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
> > > > having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in
> driver-generic
> > > > code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd
> may be
> > > > hard to reach.
> > > >
> > > > v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
> > > >    when importing an exclusive fence.
> > > >
> > > > v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
> > > >  - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
> > > >  - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file
> > > >
> > > > v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper
> > > >
> > > > v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
> > > >  - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence
> > > >
> > > > v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not
> nearly
> > > >    as useful as import.
> > > >  - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
> > > >  - Rework the commit message
> > > >
> > > > v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Require at least one sync flag
> > > >  - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a
> reference
> > > >  - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only
> > > >
> > > > v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
> > > >  - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > > >
> > > > v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Add documentation for the new ioctl
> > > >
> > > > v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> > > >
> > > > v11 (Daniel Vetter):
> > > >  - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
> > > >  - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do
> > > >
> > > > v12 (Christian König):
> > > >  - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf
> > > >
> > > > v12 (Jason Ekstrand):
> > > >  - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > > > Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
> > > > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > >
> > > Not sure which version it was that I reviewed, but with dma_resv_usage
> > > this all looks neat and tidy. One nit below.
> > >
> > > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > > index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > > >  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/sync_file.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/poll.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/mm.h>
> > > > @@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file,
> > > loff_t offset, int whence)
> > > >   * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective
> fences,
> > > i.e. the
> > > >   * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other
> necessary
> > > >   * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can
> be
> > > > + * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
> > > >   */
> > > >
> > > >  static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct
> > > dma_fence_cb *cb)
> > > > @@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf
> > > *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > > > +static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > > > +                                  void __user *user_data)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
> > > > +     enum dma_resv_usage usage;
> > > > +     struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
> > > > +     struct sync_file *sync_file;
> > > > +     int fd, ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
> > > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
> > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > We allow userspace to set both SYNC_READ and SYNC_WRITE here, I think
> > >
> > >         if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
> > >                 return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > is missing?
> > >
> >
> > We could, but I don't really get why we should disallow that.  SYNC_READ
> |
> > SYNC_WRITE is the same as SYNC_WRITE and that seems like perfectly sane
> > behavior to me.
>
> Yeah, but it's resulting in some really confusing semantics:
>
> - SYNC_WRITE gives you the write fences
> - SYNC_READ gives you the read fences _and_ the write fences
> - SYNC_WRITE | SYNC_READ gives you only the write fences
>
> Someone will get this wrong. Also pondering some more we reuse the sync
> flags from the cpu flush helpers, and there you need to set them for the
> access you're about to do. And that's also how all the drivers use, which
> means maybe the more natural meaning if these flags would be:
>
> - SYNC_WRITE | SYNC_READ (or just SYNC_WRITE) gives you both read and
>   write fences, since those are the fences you need to wait on before you
>   start writing
> - SYNC_READ only gives you the read fence
>
> This is also what Christian implemented in the dma_resv_usage_rw() helper
> for implicit sync.
>

Yup.  I've reworked to use dma_rev_usage_rw() to fix the bug.

--Jason


> -Daniel
>
> >
> > --Jason
> >
> >
> > > Also maybe a case to add to your igt.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +     fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
> > > > +     if (fd < 0)
> > > > +             return fd;
> > > > +
> > > > +     usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ?
> DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
> > > > +                                                DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
> > > > +     ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
> > > > +     if (ret)
> > > > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (!fence)
> > > > +             fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
> > > > +
> > > > +     sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
> > > > +
> > > > +     dma_fence_put(fence);
> > > > +
> > > > +     if (!sync_file) {
> > > > +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > > +             goto err_put_fd;
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > > +     fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
> > > > +
> > > > +     arg.fd = fd;
> > > > +     if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> > > > +             return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +     return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +err_put_fd:
> > > > +     put_unused_fd(fd);
> > > > +     return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > >  static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > > >                         unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > > >  {
> > > > @@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > > >       case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
> > > >               return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user
> *)arg);
> > > >
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
> > > > +     case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
> > > > +             return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user
> > > *)arg);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > >       default:
> > > >               return -ENOTTY;
> > > >       }
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > > index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
> > > > @@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> > > >
> > > >  #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN     32
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to
> retrieve
> > > the
> > > > + * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a
> sync_file.
> > > CPU
> > > > + * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically
> wait
> > > on
> > > > + * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.
> This
> > > > + * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences
> on
> > > the
> > > > + * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This
> is
> > > > + * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an
> > > explicit
> > > > + * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with
> dma-buf.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
> > > > +     /**
> > > > +      * @flags: Read/write flags
> > > > +      *
> > > > +      * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
> > > > +      *
> > > > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not
> set,
> > > > +      * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf
> to
> > > > +      * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent
> to
> > > > +      * poll() with POLLIN.
> > > > +      *
> > > > +      * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits
> on
> > > > +      * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.
> Waiting
> > > > +      * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with
> POLLOUT.
> > > > +      * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set,
> this
> > > > +      * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +     __u32 flags;
> > > > +     /** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
> > > > +     __s32 fd;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >  #define DMA_BUF_BASE         'b'
> > > >  #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct
> dma_buf_sync)
> > > >
> > > > @@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
> > > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME     _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
> > > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
> > > >  #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B   _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
> > > > +#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE       _IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2,
> > > struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
> > >
> > > With the one nit fixed for this version:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > >
> > > >
> > > >  #endif
> > > > --
> > > > 2.36.0
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 18266 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13)
  2022-05-04 22:43 [PATCH 0/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13) Jason Ekstrand
@ 2022-05-04 22:43 ` Jason Ekstrand
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jason Ekstrand @ 2022-05-04 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dri-devel
  Cc: Christian König, Jason Ekstrand, Daniel Vetter, Sumit Semwal

Modern userspace APIs like Vulkan are built on an explicit
synchronization model.  This doesn't always play nicely with the
implicit synchronization used in the kernel and assumed by X11 and
Wayland.  The client -> compositor half of the synchronization isn't too
bad, at least on intel, because we can control whether or not i915
synchronizes on the buffer and whether or not it's considered written.

The harder part is the compositor -> client synchronization when we get
the buffer back from the compositor.  We're required to be able to
provide the client with a VkSemaphore and VkFence representing the point
in time where the window system (compositor and/or display) finished
using the buffer.  With current APIs, it's very hard to do this in such
a way that we don't get confused by the Vulkan driver's access of the
buffer.  In particular, once we tell the kernel that we're rendering to
the buffer again, any CPU waits on the buffer or GPU dependencies will
wait on some of the client rendering and not just the compositor.

This new IOCTL solves this problem by allowing us to get a snapshot of
the implicit synchronization state of a given dma-buf in the form of a
sync file.  It's effectively the same as a poll() or I915_GEM_WAIT only,
instead of CPU waiting directly, it encapsulates the wait operation, at
the current moment in time, in a sync_file so we can check/wait on it
later.  As long as the Vulkan driver does the sync_file export from the
dma-buf before we re-introduce it for rendering, it will only contain
fences from the compositor or display.  This allows to accurately turn
it into a VkFence or VkSemaphore without any over-synchronization.

By making this an ioctl on the dma-buf itself, it allows this new
functionality to be used in an entirely driver-agnostic way without
having access to a DRM fd. This makes it ideal for use in driver-generic
code in Mesa or in a client such as a compositor where the DRM fd may be
hard to reach.

v2 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Use a wrapper dma_fence_array of all fences including the new one
   when importing an exclusive fence.

v3 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Lock around setting shared fences as well as exclusive
 - Mark SIGNAL_SYNC_FILE as a read-write ioctl.
 - Initialize ret to 0 in dma_buf_wait_sync_file

v4 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Use the new dma_resv_get_singleton helper

v5 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rename the IOCTLs to import/export rather than wait/signal
 - Drop the WRITE flag and always get/set the exclusive fence

v6 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Drop the sync_file import as it was all-around sketchy and not nearly
   as useful as import.
 - Re-introduce READ/WRITE flag support for export
 - Rework the commit message

v7 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Require at least one sync flag
 - Fix a refcounting bug: dma_resv_get_excl() doesn't take a reference
 - Use _rcu helpers since we're accessing the dma_resv read-only

v8 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Return -ENOMEM if the sync_file_create fails
 - Predicate support on IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)

v9 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Add documentation for the new ioctl

v10 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Go back to dma_buf_sync_file as the ioctl struct name

v11 (Daniel Vetter):
 - Go back to dma_buf_export_sync_file as the ioctl struct name
 - Better kerneldoc describing what the read/write flags do

v12 (Christian König):
 - Document why we chose to make it an ioctl on dma-buf

v13 (Jason Ekstrand):
 - Rebase on Christian König's fence rework

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Acked-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index 79795857be3e..529e0611e53b 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/debugfs.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/sync_file.h>
 #include <linux/poll.h>
 #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -192,6 +193,9 @@ static loff_t dma_buf_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
  * Note that this only signals the completion of the respective fences, i.e. the
  * DMA transfers are complete. Cache flushing and any other necessary
  * preparations before CPU access can begin still need to happen.
+ *
+ * As an alternative to poll(), the set of fences on DMA buffer can be
+ * exported as a &sync_file using &dma_buf_sync_file_export.
  */
 
 static void dma_buf_poll_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
@@ -326,6 +330,61 @@ static long dma_buf_set_name(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, const char __user *buf)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
+static long dma_buf_export_sync_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+				     void __user *user_data)
+{
+	struct dma_buf_export_sync_file arg;
+	enum dma_resv_usage usage;
+	struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
+	struct sync_file *sync_file;
+	int fd, ret;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&arg, user_data, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (arg.flags & ~DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if ((arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_RW) == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
+	if (fd < 0)
+		return fd;
+
+	usage = (arg.flags & DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE) ? DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE :
+						   DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ;
+	ret = dma_resv_get_singleton(dmabuf->resv, usage, &fence);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_put_fd;
+
+	if (!fence)
+		fence = dma_fence_get_stub();
+
+	sync_file = sync_file_create(fence);
+
+	dma_fence_put(fence);
+
+	if (!sync_file) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_put_fd;
+	}
+
+	fd_install(fd, sync_file->file);
+
+	arg.fd = fd;
+	if (copy_to_user(user_data, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_put_fd:
+	put_unused_fd(fd);
+	return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
 static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 			  unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -369,6 +428,11 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *file,
 	case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
 		return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYNC_FILE)
+	case DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE:
+		return dma_buf_export_sync_file(dmabuf, (void __user *)arg);
+#endif
+
 	default:
 		return -ENOTTY;
 	}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
index 8e4a2ca0bcbf..46f1e3e98b02 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -85,6 +85,40 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
 
 #define DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN	32
 
+/**
+ * struct dma_buf_export_sync_file - Get a sync_file from a dma-buf
+ *
+ * Userspace can perform a DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE to retrieve the
+ * current set of fences on a dma-buf file descriptor as a sync_file.  CPU
+ * waits via poll() or other driver-specific mechanisms typically wait on
+ * whatever fences are on the dma-buf at the time the wait begins.  This
+ * is similar except that it takes a snapshot of the current fences on the
+ * dma-buf for waiting later instead of waiting immediately.  This is
+ * useful for modern graphics APIs such as Vulkan which assume an explicit
+ * synchronization model but still need to inter-operate with dma-buf.
+ */
+struct dma_buf_export_sync_file {
+	/**
+	 * @flags: Read/write flags
+	 *
+	 * Must be DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ, DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE, or both.
+	 *
+	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ is set and DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is not set,
+	 * the returned sync file waits on any writers of the dma-buf to
+	 * complete.  Waiting on the returned sync file is equivalent to
+	 * poll() with POLLIN.
+	 *
+	 * If DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE is set, the returned sync file waits on
+	 * any users of the dma-buf (read or write) to complete.  Waiting
+	 * on the returned sync file is equivalent to poll() with POLLOUT.
+	 * If both DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE and DMA_BUF_SYNC_READ are set, this
+	 * is equivalent to just DMA_BUF_SYNC_WRITE.
+	 */
+	__u32 flags;
+	/** @fd: Returned sync file descriptor */
+	__s32 fd;
+};
+
 #define DMA_BUF_BASE		'b'
 #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
 
@@ -94,5 +128,6 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
 #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B	_IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
+#define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE	_IOWR(DMA_BUF_BASE, 2, struct dma_buf_export_sync_file)
 
 #endif
-- 
2.36.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-06 10:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-04 20:34 [PATCH 0/2] *dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13) Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: " Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-04 22:49   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-05  8:05     ` Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-05  8:23       ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-06  0:11         ` Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-05  6:25   ` Christian König
2022-05-05  8:10     ` Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-05  8:27       ` Christian König
2022-05-05  8:35         ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-04 20:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf: Add an API for importing sync files (v8) Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-04 22:53   ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-05  8:13     ` Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-05  8:39       ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-04 22:43 [PATCH 0/2] dma-buf: Add an API for exporting sync files (v13) Jason Ekstrand
2022-05-04 22:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Jason Ekstrand

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.