From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04AA6E0A2 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 05:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id bm25so2327614qkb.0 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 22:29:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210614163704.365989-1-jason@jlekstrand.net> <20210614163902.366168-18-jason@jlekstrand.net> <87k0mu5wly.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <87k0mu5wly.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> From: Jason Ekstrand Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:29:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 67/77] tests/i915/gem_mmap_gtt: Convert to intel_ctx_t List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: igt-dev-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "igt-dev" To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" Cc: IGT GPU Tools List-ID: On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:14 PM Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:38:52 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand > > There is also a change to tests/i915/i915_query.c included here but I guess > that is ok. > > It is the changes to gem_mmap_gtt which started me wondering why they were > made and whether intel_ctx_t is always needed for the spinner/dummyload. So > yes these are fine. I've split it into two patches and put your R-B on both. I hope that's ok. > Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit Thanks! _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev