From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Justin Erenkrantz Subject: Re: What should the Ceph Foundation be about ? Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 23:35:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <53625B94.1090309@dachary.org> <53625DBE.8090305@42on.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com ([209.85.192.44]:61012 "EHLO mail-qg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933740AbaEFDfb (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2014 23:35:31 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i50so7463915qgf.3 for ; Mon, 05 May 2014 20:35:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Patrick McGarry Cc: Wido den Hollander , Loic Dachary , Ceph Development On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Patrick McGarry wrote: > People like Jim Jagielski, Brian Stevens, Michael Tiemann, and many > others are bound to have years of experience that can help us make the > best decisions for the Ceph community. I'm really looking forward to > exploring this topic with them as they have been very welcoming so > far. Given our backgrounds, I'm sure that my advice will be similar to Jim's; but, I'm happy to act as a sounding board as someone who has been an advocate for Ceph for a while now. =) I'll be in Atlanta next week for the OpenStack Summit - happy to discuss this over drinks if you or anyone else will be there! -- justin