All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@gmail.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Lidong Chen <lidongchen@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: Fix rate limiting issue on RDMA migration
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:57:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOGPPbfgq1=K5zmALzr0gOTDcp9YsSR3+LunRDdYxcgNzaWopg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sh8uzk2k.fsf@secure.mitica>

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> Lidong Chen <jemmy858585@gmail.com> wrote:
>> RDMA migration implement save_page function for QEMUFile, but
>> ram_control_save_page do not increase bytes_xfer. So when doing
>> RDMA migration, it will use whole bandwidth.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <lidongchen@tencent.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>
> This part of the code is a mess.
>
> To answer David:
> - pos: Where we need to write that bit of stuff
> - bytex_xfer: how much have we written
>
> WHen we are doing snapshots on qcow2, we store memory in a contiguous
> piece of memory, so we can "overwrite" that "page" if a new verion
> cames. Nothing else (except the block) uses te "pos" parameter, so we
> can't not trust on it.
>
> And that  has been for a fast look at the code, that I got really
> confused (again).

Hi Juan:
     what is the problem?
     Thanks.

>
>
>
>> ---
>>  migration/qemu-file.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/qemu-file.c b/migration/qemu-file.c
>> index 2ab2bf3..217609d 100644
>> --- a/migration/qemu-file.c
>> +++ b/migration/qemu-file.c
>> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ size_t ram_control_save_page(QEMUFile *f, ram_addr_t block_offset,
>>      if (f->hooks && f->hooks->save_page) {
>>          int ret = f->hooks->save_page(f, f->opaque, block_offset,
>>                                        offset, size, bytes_sent);
>> -
>> +        f->bytes_xfer += size;
>>          if (ret != RAM_SAVE_CONTROL_DELAYED) {
>>              if (bytes_sent && *bytes_sent > 0) {
>>                  qemu_update_position(f, *bytes_sent);

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-10 14:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: Fix rate limiting issue on RDMA migration Lidong Chen
2018-03-13 12:55 ` 858585 jemmy
2018-03-14 20:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-03-15  5:33   ` 858585 jemmy
2018-03-19 12:10     ` 858585 jemmy
2018-03-20 18:19 ` Juan Quintela
2018-03-22 11:57   ` 858585 jemmy [this message]
2018-03-23 16:37 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOGPPbfgq1=K5zmALzr0gOTDcp9YsSR3+LunRDdYxcgNzaWopg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jemmy858585@gmail.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=lidongchen@tencent.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.