From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751358AbdE2MBn (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 08:01:43 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:34549 "EHLO mail-oi0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbdE2MBk (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 08:01:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <59019306.2050309@mentor.com> References: <1492085644-4195-1-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170413125929.dygodgj6c35ydh5p@sirena.org.uk> <58F06092.9080409@mentor.com> <20170425103113.lxpwoq6sbxvg3ihl@sirena.org.uk> <59019306.2050309@mentor.com> From: Fabio Estevam Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:01:27 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] *** SPI Slave mode support *** To: Jiada Wang Cc: Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-spi , Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiada, On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Jiada Wang wrote: > BUT if you think the use case don't need to be supported from SPI core, > then I don't have objection either, I will only submit imx SPI slave support > patch, > after your SPI slave support patch set been applied Geert's SPI slave series has been applied. Do you still plan to send imx spi slave support on top of it? Thanks From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] *** SPI Slave mode support *** Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:01:27 -0300 Message-ID: References: <1492085644-4195-1-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170413125929.dygodgj6c35ydh5p@sirena.org.uk> <58F06092.9080409@mentor.com> <20170425103113.lxpwoq6sbxvg3ihl@sirena.org.uk> <59019306.2050309@mentor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <59019306.2050309@mentor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiada Wang Cc: Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-spi , Rob Herring , Geert Uytterhoeven , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Shawn Guo , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Jiada, On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Jiada Wang wrote: > BUT if you think the use case don't need to be supported from SPI core, > then I don't have objection either, I will only submit imx SPI slave support > patch, > after your SPI slave support patch set been applied Geert's SPI slave series has been applied. Do you still plan to send imx spi slave support on top of it? Thanks From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: festevam@gmail.com (Fabio Estevam) Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:01:27 -0300 Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] *** SPI Slave mode support *** In-Reply-To: <59019306.2050309@mentor.com> References: <1492085644-4195-1-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com> <20170413125929.dygodgj6c35ydh5p@sirena.org.uk> <58F06092.9080409@mentor.com> <20170425103113.lxpwoq6sbxvg3ihl@sirena.org.uk> <59019306.2050309@mentor.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Jiada, On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Jiada Wang wrote: > BUT if you think the use case don't need to be supported from SPI core, > then I don't have objection either, I will only submit imx SPI slave support > patch, > after your SPI slave support patch set been applied Geert's SPI slave series has been applied. Do you still plan to send imx spi slave support on top of it? Thanks