From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 65B60E00C2A; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 04:38:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (festevam[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.217.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.217.182 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ua0-f182.google.com (mail-ua0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7021E00BE9 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 04:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua0-f182.google.com with SMTP id j53so52089446uaa.2 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 04:38:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h1rK2dehJ5BTycnaumSnEGCFaqDb0Wr1zPN/ytfaK6g=; b=UvLiBj7kAB+f6UUT3Rqjce/PJjnZHRDOwo1M1Oa3+/bIFePY4fZHdcVdYI7EsY/aBd Vxoqls8gEiCMHlKuyL9FMrzE+UZS+2cgZTSsZJC8d2gaxUSoRHAWy8HRrPAdtr/VO5fc tD/wXqs3NgqcntDvcd83eqNHM8Fb/9QC1sHB1c6m14vcnvgqqovlvpL398TyKAqXEvsi pT2c7tuJypG45I0WylZVyqCOx/shE8p3tYhR9XvFTvulu87/crsKpjzOP/byo1J/YREa DY19mqCCNH38v3oFi+HWjflMz/NoJ4PH+hdL38+e9WD6nmGV4UW0cRqDM4BUBjU8GdMX 8cYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h1rK2dehJ5BTycnaumSnEGCFaqDb0Wr1zPN/ytfaK6g=; b=uaf7c17ZloEswCxxWYAfoTZc0RpdgN+7Q7En8DFSoQBBcxbn/feFqS4n3cvOUFjrKu rUZD6GC/JMhhWps2OilqBDdzYShw3YbUZCNqLx2g/exVAjMRHuv1iXxXhtZyw0yebMvh lNMWN3JZ1JJ2jnFHw9FO7rp0bt+gqLPHwhs8SP407gxpF2Zl9vGlNWO7Wz7Q7uNDYhiN bwYYGydpIEvq+duDDMkfIbfCYkW48QzMMWDgejOvAkn4qxVdyusADRWZT8GkggNU/gop 8vhNAupQHnHsx+1qy54RZhkbeZk13rvlfyGUC/BuTtxrH7Q9StLFYSkDXq7HXK8e39aw hB3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111AeER4+P9jI4c4yYja5DnNDoeYFw3pEvR42RpfrU55+7oAixIj wz6tdFvNjnxYB+LDXWFNp/yMcKJ0ug== X-Received: by 10.176.81.52 with SMTP id e49mr8070757uaa.33.1499686719929; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 04:38:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.204.1 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 04:38:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Fabio Estevam Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:38:39 -0300 Message-ID: To: Takashi Matsuzawa Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: unable to initialize libusb: -99 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:38:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Takashi, On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > The errors we see in some peripherals like audio codec, audio tuner is > because these devices are present in the base board only. Just reviewed your logs and it seems you use the base board. Can you please use the NXP U-Boot (PREFERRED_PROVIDER_uboot = "u-boot-imx" like you did before) and check whether the tuner is probed correctly? Thanks