From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD82C433EF for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 22:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC02811D2; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 23:39:12 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="K6GrFg08"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id DE80082C6D; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 23:39:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C705980FAE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 23:39:07 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=festevam@gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id y22so91314948edq.2 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:39:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XGEz4eIs0N7B5T3Z0Ef0arJY9voXxtaoRTjaxkQ1Dko=; b=K6GrFg08FzqERbQFdOmX9gn6g2vekCMRN9dgHTXIGF89ivkm9z5D2YoRSJK6WRaFBj wcrUg1pdkEvMzX/SxDj9QgXKljH7EQLFJeNDMcRW/Rw4Py6is6K95IJVg3aFBGz+YUOl +jBAuZMw9PFreoIiw9eQLcvXJiq4t4BRQMJ17dYRbjfGvgLLPY+TlS/SuvKEuGpdqgRm x5rWyF6NG14VJ7tPo4zJhJVlAdEAk5ACaPgGwJgbnc7Fa5ZuTipElZoQfXeYiI76ze5N ybLam9/3HWaZtgJEHlEAUFABaTUQCynos/INm5jMq5BLrwjVlaidC0gaHuuwgTE2s1sr 90qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XGEz4eIs0N7B5T3Z0Ef0arJY9voXxtaoRTjaxkQ1Dko=; b=hZky/tIfK/fhj8xaa22VpZLfqDcgOV3WxAObByV/oI3ExNkABkN4K8KqZqz5NOHDIz fmeNGN4rDD9Wvq69LgxlELSViQ7pRkOVbD40byETTg89ZZ4Au28I+ltUpVRAfhxdCoel otERPcXkkltwkW5o6v+ewpSE76xdKx4mEGJR61lkebe0IgGGp7ZSYwzDhU+lcuEAJH21 q2M/Jlr7KAHf4Hdnka+3SbmOEjghTKdXbz8jcU+Vq56mbjHp1Z2qLHhMGJMZTqbLKdOl 5BynoM3am74dtRNOmKiVRbnfouufo8Klbi7bs71eua2mo2ZcQuUl8uPEnGlBqMbnAaTj 3N8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GsmgbySq5W9Qav7cn04anycWQFIPBK2unOXhmFfTJdZOHegvl QR2ZUf0RPAbh1VtUvYgBRsvjfjLV+mI2J9rZDSg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypULJQhKNx/IiqoL6QZFB4Mz+tpT9SSh2mf2Z5NrBIUloGFyynU2Wgz38MwjNbNSAKTJDSCW1KAP1TBNnb1pA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7205:: with SMTP id dr5mr22732581ejc.696.1640817547401; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:39:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211228165221.GA127430@tom-desktop> <20211229203305.GA6524@tom-desktop> <20211229220824.GA15234@tom-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20211229220824.GA15234@tom-desktop> From: Fabio Estevam Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:38:56 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: help on udoo_neo power up on mainline uboot To: Tommaso Merciai Cc: Tom Rini , Stefano Babic , Simon Glass , Breno Lima , Francesco Montefoschi , U-Boot-Denx , Peter Robinson , linux-fancy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.38 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Tommaso, On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 7:08 PM Tommaso Merciai wrote: > Hi Fabio, > I'll check and let u know. This patch these gpio's to get righ ram cfg > right? > > Let me know. Yes, according to Peter, the failure comes only during the second call to get_board_value() I think the patch below should fix it: diff --git a/board/udoo/neo/neo.c b/board/udoo/neo/neo.c index 62f81fff6817..075c4f208f23 100644 --- a/board/udoo/neo/neo.c +++ b/board/udoo/neo/neo.c @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ static int get_board_value(void) * Extended 1 1 */ + gpio_free(IMX_GPIO_NR(4, 13)); + gpio_free(IMX_GPIO_NR(4, 0)); return (r184 << 1) + r185; } Thanks