From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:26:51 -0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 29/32] fsl_esdhc: Update usdhc driver to
 support i.MX8
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB300482D714638B1159F970A488520@HE1PR04MB3004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20180718013602.26574-1-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <20180718013602.26574-30-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <CAOMZO5DDT5LCNVDQwbcSLyREkW9Oh-eRtUKry9q+m6qgkdW0eQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR04MB300482D714638B1159F970A488520@HE1PR04MB3004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5AZvA7xvyZmAx-5tndVtpT62Hc+_x6tWy3Oh9dniaBs0w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Peng,

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:

> There is i.MX8/8X/8M, 8M is for i.MX8MQ and i.MX8MM
> i.MX8/8X has different SoC architecture compared with i.MX8M,
> such as there is SCU inside i.MX8/8X.
> So add a new macro dedicated for i.MX8/8X.

Yes, I understand the differences between the MX8 family.

Couldn't you make CONFIG_IMX8 instead of CONFIG_ARCH_IMX8 for consistency?

Also, for consistency: should CONFIG_MX8M be changed to CONFIG_IMX8M?

Thanks