From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Remove an outdated comment Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 16:20:49 -0300 Message-ID: References: <1491410411-6053-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com (mail-oi0-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5D5266943 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:20:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id b187so3623708oif.3 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Timur Tabi Cc: Fabio Estevam , Nicolin Chen , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Mark Brown List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 04/05/2017 11:40 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Therefore, we tell >> - * ALSA that we support all rates and let the codec driver decide what >> rates >> - * are really supported. > > This part is still true, though, isn't it? I have sent a v2 that keeps this part, but after thinking more about it the "codec driver decide what rates are supported" part applies only to SSI slave mode, so IMHO we could just remove the entire comment.