From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:51:00 -0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 29/32] fsl_esdhc: Update usdhc driver to
 support i.MX8
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB4481B5AFC7C3D10BDBDC683B88550@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20180718013602.26574-1-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <20180718013602.26574-30-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <CAOMZO5DDT5LCNVDQwbcSLyREkW9Oh-eRtUKry9q+m6qgkdW0eQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <HE1PR04MB300482D714638B1159F970A488520@HE1PR04MB3004.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAOMZO5AZvA7xvyZmAx-5tndVtpT62Hc+_x6tWy3Oh9dniaBs0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <AM0PR04MB4481B5AFC7C3D10BDBDC683B88550@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BY=5B39ivckBMiOVZSiJHvMMz6HUw_DL-pvsWb49cn_A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Peng,

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:

> In V1, I use CONFIG_IMX8, but I think there is no need to use it, because
> CONFIG_ARCH_IMX8 could do same thing.

Yes, I prefer to drop "ARCH" for consistency.

> I could revert to use CONFIG_IMX8, since you prefer it.

Yes, that would be better.

>> Also, for consistency: should CONFIG_MX8M be changed to CONFIG_IMX8M?
>
> Yes. CONFIG_MX8M also need to be changed to CONFIG_IMX8M, but not in this patchset.

Correct.

Thanks