From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 21266E00B67; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 07:25:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (festevam[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.213.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64ADFE0070F for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 07:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id r125so30238572vkf.1 for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 07:25:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bLbYhAjM+QqvTNR4yA1xHAaz6qb+j7xSvKcrrZgf5KE=; b=fDPaX6yRBrrm9HVD3pj9fGVLVH016TlLrXzzXkE8aHW2OPxyVQUY7tXSkHpzOBk/1m QmhPLsB2i1eRaLKbyh6sHCgGk7bKklj+mlYzu8GmkXGetEjNxxe4ogMQOrwqshRfHPnI VqWC+QQ3O2B7wlrc/gk5CjHujRHy9lA3R+tatjFs1wHlhAU8aGhrTlkBWdvmBkcj5Z0+ wrTvl0dttxcKiSXwH1sAKES6essUPMcQLXsQPBhbDqUL6zPAnjNMheKmPZRTjetMVZKV NCi7MyuNmlkTcbT7/VbtD9mU0xy8PGR03SHyKbZLRsSG6dMukxc9XFskX9as/RQ/thSk OrFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bLbYhAjM+QqvTNR4yA1xHAaz6qb+j7xSvKcrrZgf5KE=; b=Qsc2HrsI7NAU3FTmrfazPJiRGcqm+8643wL0UfRqh4KO5n2pdIS+rKrPQmpWLFMGG7 gW1/5NTBmZpV9yWldVzkx/bMrn0cWILG6GICcpZZqBkQjGfNji+DE4cfUwlRxgGLcHuw Inq9gB3Gfcj63xr7/x3H8Hki2Fsu+4TpoOPu+dDKUth/JLfpPvLKHXmUUhruiKa/EJbT wWy32YvUWw4MQBnyq/Eijl96FZbm8yeKjcy/qiUyi7rJbVqTrhLbVbJh9RtYZ7/d5iyG B3rUWx8KINpBnkAZKtaPzXlFh0uy07lQ5Hd88BBQu6T2g1d3hpSH+YVS/ETPOitUL7Sw dBiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113CKSkteoscODVftZbHHpmrWnkniFM2DYMNZLeqgTwj+ujpMaQK jfOzPEzoN8NU+Lass0z8UMkOx5hGFg== X-Received: by 10.31.6.205 with SMTP id 196mr3414174vkg.46.1499523919909; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 07:25:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.204.1 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 07:25:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Fabio Estevam Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 11:25:19 -0300 Message-ID: To: Otavio Salvador Cc: Fabio Estevam , Takashi Matsuzawa , "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: unable to initialize libusb: -99 X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 14:25:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Takashi, On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Takashi Matsuzawa > wrote: >> >> I examined this today again, and found that following makes this error >> disappear. >> >> >> PERFERRED_PROVIDER_uboot = "u-boot-imx" >> >> PERFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader = "u-boot-imx" >> >> PERFERRED_PROVIDER_uboot-mxsboot-native = "u-boot-imx" >> >> >> Looks like recent u-boot-fslc does not handle imx6qsabreauto (which I was >> trying), and if I specified u-boot-imx, errors from pca953x, mag3110, >> mma845x are all gone, and I can lsusb to list USB devices. > > > Awesome! Fabio, could you take a look on U-Boot to figure what is missing? Could you please test the following patch against U-Boot 2017.05? https://pastebin.com/K9P6n1Z7 Thanks