From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ve0-f172.google.com (mail-ve0-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D6CE014D0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id oz10so619869veb.17 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6eCtQkGankIq4NwOcgO2Gdv+DSDBVxyHHmTYxqBoFJg=; b=whh+DmUVys0xUMh5zBHb3OdVJrEgikXWHWuqcihsgQx8Ctyw7MN0NrtZWlhm2KK6sa az8oyKMWU8hI5CCVKLfr+9Mh+cuNv7HljNouVDSCSTfDlo6w31chE+CjEVhi91SPz0ge IrLbWw1rm/T+cCkYIg+9EB04sqzC86TXqIkhFF8tIFPUhTq8IO14LOa/EQ7Lt/130iL5 1ncmDybrHhwSZM+GuUwdnsqsTkWOnUtEq+gCh1RJK8NAIgNE97d+HmDjIqPmrwWbkwyR 1hH8q0EiVmsrN3VvSrnLb3+mUQayBNiqpVd6tMonCpk2o+jGCLDo2EYxBTQS9YTvz7pR JyZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.70.49 with SMTP id j17mr1856510vdu.67.1365612759559; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.59.5.201 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:52:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1365535321-27350-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1365535321-27350-8-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5164D31A.7030108@gmail.com> <20130410141524.334be50f@e6520eb> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:52:39 -0300 Message-ID: From: Fabio Estevam To: Otavio Salvador Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm-extra][PATCH v2 6/8] u-boot-imx: Remove Wandboard patch as it is not supported by mainline X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:52:40 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Otavio, On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > When we discussed if we should or not move to 2013.04 we had agreed > rc2 should go first and get it tested until stable were finished for > next week release. Sounds good. Yes, I just wanted to explain that my tests were on this platform were not extensive. I think using mainline U-boot for this board makes sense. If I didn't think so, I would not have submitted the U-boot patch :-) So if people using this board on a more extensive way like testing video playback, GPU, HDMI, SATA, etc think that the mainline U-boot is in good shape to make the transition now. then it is all fine. It would be nice if could get some Tested-by from the community, but people probably need some more time to get some testing done. If people think it is working as good as 2009.08 then we can use the mainline U-boot and leave 2009.08 as optional as proposed earlier. Regards, Fabio Estevam