From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)? Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:50:59 -0200 Message-ID: References: <54BD33DC.40200@ti.com> <20150119174317.GK20386@saruman> <20150120001643.7D15AA8@black.fi.intel.com> <20150120114555.GA11502@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150120140546.DDCB8D4@black.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150120140546.DDCB8D4@black.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Nishanth Menon , Felipe Balbi , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-next , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-omap List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> > Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to >> > , but I'm not sure if it's possible. >> >> Well, IMHO the folded approach in asm-generic was done the wrong way >> which barred ARM from ever using it. > > Okay, I see. > > Regarding the topic bug. Completely untested patch is below. Could anybody > check if it helps? Yes, it helps. Now I can boot mx6 running linux-next 20150120 with your patch applied. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5E56B0032 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:51:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id p9so10652565lbv.4 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:51:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zl8si15438429lbb.27.2015.01.20.06.50.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:50:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id pn19so34621241lab.9 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:50:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150120140546.DDCB8D4@black.fi.intel.com> References: <54BD33DC.40200@ti.com> <20150119174317.GK20386@saruman> <20150120001643.7D15AA8@black.fi.intel.com> <20150120114555.GA11502@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150120140546.DDCB8D4@black.fi.intel.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:50:59 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [next-20150119]regression (mm)? From: Fabio Estevam Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Nishanth Menon , Felipe Balbi , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-next , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-omap On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> > Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to >> > , but I'm not sure if it's possible. >> >> Well, IMHO the folded approach in asm-generic was done the wrong way >> which barred ARM from ever using it. > > Okay, I see. > > Regarding the topic bug. Completely untested patch is below. Could anybody > check if it helps? Yes, it helps. Now I can boot mx6 running linux-next 20150120 with your patch applied. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: festevam@gmail.com (Fabio Estevam) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:50:59 -0200 Subject: [next-20150119]regression (mm)? In-Reply-To: <20150120140546.DDCB8D4@black.fi.intel.com> References: <54BD33DC.40200@ti.com> <20150119174317.GK20386@saruman> <20150120001643.7D15AA8@black.fi.intel.com> <20150120114555.GA11502@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150120140546.DDCB8D4@black.fi.intel.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> > Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to >> > , but I'm not sure if it's possible. >> >> Well, IMHO the folded approach in asm-generic was done the wrong way >> which barred ARM from ever using it. > > Okay, I see. > > Regarding the topic bug. Completely untested patch is below. Could anybody > check if it helps? Yes, it helps. Now I can boot mx6 running linux-next 20150120 with your patch applied.