From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757642AbcB1N4w (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:52 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34675 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757247AbcB1N4t (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> References: <1446758362-11702-1-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <1446758362-11702-2-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <20151105222325.GA26159@roeck-us.net> <20151106220249.GA19791@roeck-us.net> <565F4244.7090502@timesys.com> <20151228162923.GA31680@spo001.leaseweb.nl> <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:56:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via 'ext-reset-output' dt prop From: Fabio Estevam To: Akshay Bhat Cc: Rob Herring , Wim Van Sebroeck , Tim Harvey , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Justin Waters , Lucas Stach , Stefan Roese Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote: >> I have no objections against the idea and the code itself. >> But as Guenter pointed out: it would be handy to get feedback from the >> devicetree maintainers on the above discussion. >> >> Kind regards, >> Wim. >> > > Any suggestions on whether a vendor specific prefix is necessary? Any comments? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via 'ext-reset-output' dt prop Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:56:49 -0300 Message-ID: References: <1446758362-11702-1-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <1446758362-11702-2-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <20151105222325.GA26159@roeck-us.net> <20151106220249.GA19791@roeck-us.net> <565F4244.7090502@timesys.com> <20151228162923.GA31680@spo001.leaseweb.nl> <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <56AA79DA.2010305-jEh4hwF5bVhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Akshay Bhat Cc: Rob Herring , Wim Van Sebroeck , Tim Harvey , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Justin Waters , Lucas Stach , Stefan Roese List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Rob, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote: >> I have no objections against the idea and the code itself. >> But as Guenter pointed out: it would be handy to get feedback from the >> devicetree maintainers on the above discussion. >> >> Kind regards, >> Wim. >> > > Any suggestions on whether a vendor specific prefix is necessary? Any comments? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34675 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757247AbcB1N4t (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 08:56:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> References: <1446758362-11702-1-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <1446758362-11702-2-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <20151105222325.GA26159@roeck-us.net> <20151106220249.GA19791@roeck-us.net> <565F4244.7090502@timesys.com> <20151228162923.GA31680@spo001.leaseweb.nl> <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:56:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via 'ext-reset-output' dt prop From: Fabio Estevam To: Akshay Bhat Cc: Rob Herring , Wim Van Sebroeck , Tim Harvey , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Justin Waters , Lucas Stach , Stefan Roese Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Rob, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote: >> I have no objections against the idea and the code itself. >> But as Guenter pointed out: it would be handy to get feedback from the >> devicetree maintainers on the above discussion. >> >> Kind regards, >> Wim. >> > > Any suggestions on whether a vendor specific prefix is necessary? Any comments? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: festevam@gmail.com (Fabio Estevam) Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:56:49 -0300 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] watchdog: imx2_wdt: add external reset support via 'ext-reset-output' dt prop In-Reply-To: <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> References: <1446758362-11702-1-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <1446758362-11702-2-git-send-email-akshay.bhat@timesys.com> <20151105222325.GA26159@roeck-us.net> <20151106220249.GA19791@roeck-us.net> <565F4244.7090502@timesys.com> <20151228162923.GA31680@spo001.leaseweb.nl> <56AA79DA.2010305@timesys.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Rob, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Akshay Bhat wrote: >> I have no objections against the idea and the code itself. >> But as Guenter pointed out: it would be handy to get feedback from the >> devicetree maintainers on the above discussion. >> >> Kind regards, >> Wim. >> > > Any suggestions on whether a vendor specific prefix is necessary? Any comments?