From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B93E01492 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id gd11so973817vcb.16 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:41:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EAfxXMYH2eIRag8uWD6MqsL78UBbkSfcU0+UOKRqbp0=; b=XOiapsLXsyW9B4qAuYsEmDC8bJ6Hp1f6L2lT+1P3z7dlv6IRWnwwBisOzglGoV6mk5 CLEcSPpbiu7YeK8wOZgNeFDwuDJ3F9kZOhmFZePv/Hp4bPeQkNqdhtnXigI3V2RY86w/ hRuFQQ0BQhEb+zAQ2O9oMAk0qEYZ2+f5WlxZLwQfdVxuGqPmnAOOsDJOuHwXNRQAYdTm im8HKZGpSJ7oMj10FuHaQ9/h7ayoXKAjf3rUcz7l3Dnhpi9lC3e+9pmM0NbkBUVXqhSI hHlHYWsYZ7rwUpaSnGK2MwuuF7g0zruwJi/LkWHJ5y1EqHeqK53DKxjiQcd4JRRHovvB i30A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.227.198 with SMTP id sc6mr6115279vec.59.1372448500908; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.237.66 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:41:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1372424067-3097-2-git-send-email-daiane.angolini@freescale.com> References: <1372424067-3097-1-git-send-email-daiane.angolini@freescale.com> <1372424067-3097-2-git-send-email-daiane.angolini@freescale.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:41:40 -0300 Message-ID: From: Fabio Estevam To: Daiane Angolini , alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 2/2] linux-imx (3.0.35): Add fix pll4 set_rate callback X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 19:41:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Daiane Angolini wrote: > +- if (rev >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1) { > ++ if ((rev >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1) && > ++ (pllbase == PLL5_VIDEO_BASE_ADDR)) { Subject mentions pll4, but here you check for pll5. Which one is correct?