From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752395AbaBLJee (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 04:34:34 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:42589 "EHLO mail-pb0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752366AbaBLJe3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 04:34:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140212083224.GM15081@lee--X1> References: <1392177760-17959-1-git-send-email-lpapp@kde.org> <20140212083224.GM15081@lee--X1> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:34:28 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JJAl4ZBmg0duNHTNkNQygAcMGWQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mfd: MAX6650/6651 support From: Laszlo Papp To: Lee Jones Cc: Sachin Kamat , Linus Walleij , LKML , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> + max665x->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &max665x_regmap_config); >> > >> > Don't you need to check the return value of devm_regmap_init_i2c? >> >> I personally think I should. I strived for consistency though with >> other similar drivers. After this many reviews about such things, it >> seems that consistency matters here less than other projects which I >> can cope with, thanks. > > The right thing to do is normally preferred. Yes, sure.