From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E614C433E0 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4582F206D5 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 12:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mMdbCxAW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728629AbgEVMBl (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2020 08:01:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58868 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728544AbgEVMBl (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2020 08:01:41 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB70C061A0E for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 05:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id d5so1555241ios.9 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 05:01:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9kfDyeRgXwcRKAWrO1OF4PmjRLDKlvTyyEANMi71FpY=; b=mMdbCxAWmOiuD3/jU/Yqf6Tmxb3DgG3yldd+y5NJlrcv8OZPxh1mT8Zst3kiPKT42V o1QX2zYeMwf3d7RshmQKrdA3u5zyafq1DFXjGlUbrqbFuZzxJI68xSEM543ZUCqKjPP1 G59/S4RrQz+cuPfosHefEiu1Wejb9GofjjNI9qH2InnwsgOKvrxh3iSzjbWGAHbKhwqo PuMGzK5Fn7TKP+ckInCDSx5YnSv1FS8f/KcdZJizhewh6Bkc04PtMFdD2CgLeBY8U+O2 AGsq0zyVkDFY0DeP57t3M72n25/Ww8KCthoG+I3EZ4Wsb4uRpJ5BxPLd7avxAKoDC0GH Pafg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9kfDyeRgXwcRKAWrO1OF4PmjRLDKlvTyyEANMi71FpY=; b=U9UBtWgL3HWePk31fxcIGRCaNJx2EaMN5hfixvk3R3jhoB7k4ZH+7iKOzJ6wLP+mmQ eO19N6MSh8k4id9LYVApzY6Ci+skh05bivyhX5vDFMcfZrXLew9yLG+pUEahyJbuhAWk 7QUiRrSxLlAcLCn9uHFk0KK8EOvW+ySx0DqjXCelcYcYUe00MqnqsXZxO8htHy5eosav 7fjZIyhgjl2foBnO4EYDr3Apvk7Xc3nan//+l1ueUO6ueqcSengwtWYMcO/T4NVG8Eek 1mhV2wqDnVlUSEjRz+wdRitwmOrZ3oeKs5Tm4AkHG/CknVKP2sO3MsgTxQRMJIeadMfN ZY+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BvohrJIXOVHkNJ1gmDN1VwavJ80Jz8MEt9NhJjmb4lYWtRR5t dJanZg56GtpoGhFdlwfvjri8OAwF02kncNBXdvw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUaKr4c+D5hJkkleNBNzL1iOfXbE8Z5tVHrtxQj9FpFdQK450tsESKj8KyK3Lr+zk8bytg47i3Swt/a3KjE+g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:4a:: with SMTP id z10mr2761914ioz.186.1590148900727; Fri, 22 May 2020 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200522035029.3022405-1-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: From: Amir Goldstein Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 15:01:29 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] xfs: rework inode flushing to make inode reclaim fully asynchronous To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org > > Since this is a "long standing issue" I am sure you have tests. > Can you please share the tests you used (simoop?) with some > encouraging performance numbers - flattening the stall curve ;-). > Found the numbers and OOM story in patch 13. Thanks, Amir.