From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E802C433F5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239457AbiBBNth (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:49:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60544 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229526AbiBBNth (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:49:37 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6C8C061714 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 05:49:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id 15so17060260ilg.8 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:49:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DXZdCtyffwL4vCc6tPbTtK79j9gtn5iG0VXS2LnY834=; b=BwaIgE3LKN9ZF0ds7GsfEMRubG61ipkFszlhwVOSbdPV3aMgRaveZCSpjdXAkCkLXc plubooe+bwRQmWOgLpFlkZgmGpC0KbF4kmCNbZcSmFhGHGSlZtKK2NZ92AzM60+h/E16 IhaRBKGuLsR7r0lBNyJMsW0zRgDlrIiAIrQbuX0YecZuMBHmqZAYNYUtzMnTQt315ygv hwfQEG4df/bL9xZMGAzhGG5s6YsQiu01k8zWSuLlgqTPsDyyoSRulmkwPtOmzZv3vXo1 T8MUCd8fEv8L5QB3xsimdLEdQKN6jfRx2lkmkFXdwun1xtV5vSuLfkIuTJdSHG9FaUp6 uN6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DXZdCtyffwL4vCc6tPbTtK79j9gtn5iG0VXS2LnY834=; b=bCzxQMy2iszKBtna9DLtdkmBgBBvqr3ZBF+8VAAJvT1nECk6F9tOkF0YYlYC0g7Jwd XVKWV6ZXoxSJwUbgvHiGop0gY77oE67ezxSerx6HvTE+JGlVS4yE1SLY2J4FRRLSVhef 9gvQl1pBwyc2YfFHzxptFVqWzt9i9Psya9syaHMfkiknwTH5kGsStDxe7V5I1eHqZiAJ VDfaUQ1V+X1ydrHFbbwrI8XIbG0OGoZIkrRR8HK1eltMpeg2h8O66hi4QDU0+w3WfSm2 LlpNyJWk29RldC6jmFNT7XopgbgvsgtxXzt1dM4jYgGMLX0qTRulwZpckVXUhfyjNkLT /urw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ENanjM/TV2yPhwmmErfhuERi4fn/cstxdXdjekjHmcXFOENZ+ xedfapPzHF2gz2+VWi6YIfZpbVC3rPV1tu2rZUU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1FQImVhmi2FyjUGW44ZE7PEXt6lJs6jbJyL90VmbF2fpIq9L6iSexL8uEYxQUuobpwxaiCKdw6WiNN1f4ajM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1b85:: with SMTP id h5mr18702420ili.107.1643809776280; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:49:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: From: Amir Goldstein Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:49:25 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event To: Petr Vorel , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Cc: Jan Kara , Matthew Bobrowski , Ext4 , kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov , LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi all, > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > Thanks! > Guys, Looks like we have a regression. With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. Gabriel, Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test instead of the default 5min. Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... Thanks, Amir. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F789C433FE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 13:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9B63C98D5 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:49:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AC9C3C98A8 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:49:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E951000A4A for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id s1so17056260ilj.7 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:49:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DXZdCtyffwL4vCc6tPbTtK79j9gtn5iG0VXS2LnY834=; b=BwaIgE3LKN9ZF0ds7GsfEMRubG61ipkFszlhwVOSbdPV3aMgRaveZCSpjdXAkCkLXc plubooe+bwRQmWOgLpFlkZgmGpC0KbF4kmCNbZcSmFhGHGSlZtKK2NZ92AzM60+h/E16 IhaRBKGuLsR7r0lBNyJMsW0zRgDlrIiAIrQbuX0YecZuMBHmqZAYNYUtzMnTQt315ygv hwfQEG4df/bL9xZMGAzhGG5s6YsQiu01k8zWSuLlgqTPsDyyoSRulmkwPtOmzZv3vXo1 T8MUCd8fEv8L5QB3xsimdLEdQKN6jfRx2lkmkFXdwun1xtV5vSuLfkIuTJdSHG9FaUp6 uN6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DXZdCtyffwL4vCc6tPbTtK79j9gtn5iG0VXS2LnY834=; b=wT8AqIBhyh8YBtrx0nh+b1bm3ltj0azmq5l56ojJoeyQG5xXwNZFEwdHwaPUHGuy51 OecFwe7uIWvXzpAlz0mJJmnWnSDxJdbLHBTVWkXsTRZ5/IXmy5pJY/0EQutnPEKamRXG I8YVfq53aOK5bKPjeE3gUFX4CCTLxo1e1NnYIshM6t7TzxgWJxgDHfTC9Jz/zcs7Pn1x 2tmfRqFignfjDdptHcyMX1JCjSZOuaa0RLJ2x0X4JRRdRZG3C7KPDsBjiEE5P+OipvCV iJ3WQ4g8XfonGaNSmmSRfCC2lSQ+K0q7d5OqN8idRRBFf0OMQcxM8zB6za+tiJfelm9O RmEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IX9Bt4M7qur8hQFRdtl4anXJZsYQqx6hWXeE8Z4uQ/mUY1Zab YfhTpJ6JojfmNRB9BLD0v0wPVBNrrRbsSyxuso0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1FQImVhmi2FyjUGW44ZE7PEXt6lJs6jbJyL90VmbF2fpIq9L6iSexL8uEYxQUuobpwxaiCKdw6WiNN1f4ajM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1b85:: with SMTP id h5mr18702420ili.107.1643809776280; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 05:49:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211118235744.802584-1-krisman@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: From: Amir Goldstein Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:49:25 +0200 Message-ID: To: Petr Vorel , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov , Matthew Bobrowski , Jan Kara , Ext4 , LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi all, > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > Thanks! > Guys, Looks like we have a regression. With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. Gabriel, Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test instead of the default 5min. Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... Thanks, Amir. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp