From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amir Goldstein Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] ovl: lookup redirect by file handle Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:57:48 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1493025256-27188-1-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> <1493025256-27188-6-git-send-email-amir73il@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:32791 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946532AbdD1J5u (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 05:57:50 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id k87so9907644ioi.0 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:57:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-unionfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: "linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org" , Vivek Goyal On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> Well, we could add configuration options to decide if and how to follow >> and verify fh for non-dir, but: >> >> 1. We agreed that trying to follow fh for non-dir is a no-loose situation >> for !redirect and hot cache case and a probable win for redirect with >> cold case > > Okay. That also means that redirect is not actually needed for > non-dir. Well, except for the weird case of having to reconstruct a > reverse mapping after copying the layers in order to properly handle > copy up of hardlinks on the lower layer. But lets not care about that > for now (or ever, probably). > It's needed for when we can't lookup by fh: - lower has NULL uuid - !same_lower_sb (may be relaxed going forward) Heh, it's hard too keep track of it all ;-) Once all the dust is settled, I'll sit down to write a 'Redirect by file handle' section for Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.txt that will summarize all cases. Amir.