From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABE5C433E0 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 09:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC38207ED for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 09:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ggl6IbwM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731643AbgEZJVM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 05:21:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55178 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728837AbgEZJVM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 05:21:12 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com (mail-io1-xd41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF30C03E97E for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id o5so21153547iow.8 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:21:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2sgSrXdI341CB1ZKkBLGOWJSDm+jrqpmxGPseKGI+iU=; b=ggl6IbwMVNtzqYLPr9Ack9YbMCB46cL2RxKUb1ONlVdGrXBgSlViQ+2LlHWzcM5dUQ 9/nDH5+lwiMC2oy7cHhlCZdmHqXXtKS7xht8rGhw2oScrt7lMF1GYztAUq1W1SOYvCz+ +Giy+8rzj1YgqY9dKAn1j9xWuSwoXpymqHgQlsTfkRf6GiZCISkaqmuGcbKRaKKtaQDI L1EL1CGooHfQjHSQbYnIhJI7xzDjpnZP7TKhdnShw8Q5VqUU/NheiynAfwBOnEx18ZVN /BdjwjCB07Ge9QE9GI0QcpPR16CrAVdCqSJZpSuGdizIEWrVMeQ+3vIVgyIR427qloOa 3DdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2sgSrXdI341CB1ZKkBLGOWJSDm+jrqpmxGPseKGI+iU=; b=swpizyrdCHdiEp6ptrIVIRe/oqeG4E7LEMJCQ4Yb01Izk3caSEF9q/Y1tS/OSd4Jvp AmZKmtyHDLK0MQzNcEnrGITXCWKGGf7kcq2C1RjTYX0PaawIyMdlOvEAkxYfjsuu9S4A 1/WCUPpmI6fDVbpDUS9c1DuJ1n/Sqx3x/PdESPrppafwn9X1a9lMibNU1Lv6VtDZLOJz 0ew9oHNujkuJ2yKXpFiglp3AMdscqMS3DyQPzG5JlsAbeuIL3AWRVwpJlUHBeToL0vg/ RK51qHiYx3mkvtVX/k8wDnVZZ539nlhWas8opJWVPtyWQhghwnnBCQHmUscL5b16OP7p E5og== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530eUHmcr1M86Tao1Mm4e255ePrzlzSg/0kviKkKUaT9XciYdSHc q7jt2V85I6fEq59VmdJrFMPpA7FZKQN4EWv9xDw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYuSMsKdE1P1xQzZ0ujoO3b78LO1sDtWGIAuWiEkcmSHePxC3DlNs6XGHPjpShGq7CCg2DwJOAASI/6S1X+jo= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8c95:: with SMTP id g21mr16087777ion.72.1590484870548; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <157784106066.1364230.569420432829402226.stgit@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <157784106066.1364230.569420432829402226.stgit@magnolia> From: Amir Goldstein Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:20:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] xfs: widen timestamps to deal with y2038 To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-xfs , Eric Sandeen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 3:11 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Hi all, > > This series performs some refactoring of our timestamp and inode > encoding functions, then retrofits the timestamp union to handle > timestamps as a 64-bit nanosecond counter. Next, it refactors the quota > grace period expiration timer code a bit before implementing bit > shifting to widen the effective counter size to 34 bits. This enables > correct time handling on XFS through the year 2486. > I intend to start review of this series. I intend to focus on correctness of conversions and on backward forward compatibility. I saw Eric's comments on quota patches and that you mentioned you addressed some of them. I do not intend to review correctness of existing quota code anyway ;-) I see that you updated the branch 3 days ago and that patch 2/14 was dropped. I assume the rest of the series is mostly unchanged, but I can verify that before reviewing each patch. As far as you are concerned, should I wait for v2 or can I continue to review this series? Thanks, Amir. > If you're going to start using this mess, you probably ought to just > pull from my git trees, which are linked below. > > This is an extraordinary way to destroy everything. Enjoy! > Comments and questions are, as always, welcome. > > --D > > kernel git tree: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=bigtime > > xfsprogs git tree: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfsprogs-dev.git/log/?h=bigtime > > fstests git tree: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfstests-dev.git/log/?h=bigtime