All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
To: Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: markgross@thegnar.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] OMAP4: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:38:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAORVsuUtJ05AHrT0C3rUg_2iUH=NfKdWpqqzoEZms9pYXR6u6A__28165.7976600856$1313505575$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4A7E25.8020701@ti.com>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2011 07:13 PM, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
>>
>> This patch adds wake up latency numbers for OMAP4. Note that these are
>> preliminary numbers and need to be relooked.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS<vishwanath.bs@ti.com>
>>
>> The INACTIVE state is added as unsupported.
>>
> In that case, don't add that support in first place. When INA support is
> getting added, you can update these as well.
No. A value is needed for all states, even if unsupported at the
moment. Omitting a value causes it to be set to '0', which means 'no
latency'.

Jean

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-16 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-16 13:43 [PATCH v5 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints framework jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 01/15] PM QoS: move and rename the implementation files jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 02/15] PM QoS: minor clean-ups jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 03/15] PM QoS: code re-organization jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] PM QoS: generalize and export the constraints management code jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] PM QoS: implement the per-device PM QoS constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 21:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 21:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] PM QoS: add a global notification mechanism for the device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 21:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 21:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] OMAP: convert I2C driver to PM QoS for latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] OMAP: PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
2011-08-16 14:25   ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:34     ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-16 14:37       ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:37       ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:34     ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-16 14:25   ` Santosh
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP4: " jean.pihet
2011-08-16 14:26   ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:38     ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-16 14:58       ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:58       ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:38     ` Jean Pihet [this message]
2011-08-16 14:26   ` Santosh
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] OMAP: PM CONSTRAINTS: implement the devices " jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] OMAP2+: cpuidle only influences the MPU state jean.pihet
2011-08-16 14:16   ` Santosh
2011-08-16 14:16   ` Santosh
2011-08-16 13:43 ` jean.pihet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-11 15:06 [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP4: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` jean.pihet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAORVsuUtJ05AHrT0C3rUg_2iUH=NfKdWpqqzoEZms9pYXR6u6A__28165.7976600856$1313505575$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.