From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0907C33CB3 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AC222522 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=newoldbits-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@newoldbits-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="l3Z1hxfS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730052AbgAOLjM (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:39:12 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:38262 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729900AbgAOLjM (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:39:12 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w1so18193233ljh.5 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 03:39:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=newoldbits-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b99yf3V8kQex5BIi+mQnGvlxUrIVGOkE8WgpWWd/Eaw=; b=l3Z1hxfSM4kFVEY/xccCbXDwFfEPIvnoP0Bt4x6TKvKi6IgISWEGzhpkNbcHMjUEQD jkMFMnmgkw7rbjyJ0gIu/o6GGMf7CrTmRjzmfbRENzur3PNwpcfwczRbOM0KRSMF72oo bLRzy4Lf6MzxTxyoF9OreoWUrEq91+YBOZcWi4MsLa1OQSNsE12zL7AuF3xlHd0U7KHN Hhpy3t8mkIwxdlckceyqTnnMbl8aEYvV9xDgs5F+86driBR6NAUClIwuz9IwrWVkzxfU d5FHURsVN2A+3NqueyYGV6vLdO4FAQ3HfvVFJchXZxNUqfcRlpRCSsa32rGTErhy+4yT ASdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b99yf3V8kQex5BIi+mQnGvlxUrIVGOkE8WgpWWd/Eaw=; b=jvxVJW5rNNpEgi0kIonEJ3BM6c6Y9EMaqdfK4xCYQgN8dVrPoP0QRMsywx900ojQBY OisHl8gnPxQnfJoLOt5YGSKAobdoxJGNWn+JyuTpVcMMm9X/dGLnvz6lNVfv3wtOCEEA FVVxkPtk96G30dSUsBGcohqi9c8lo5RcgumMI9FgeIXJvZG8S4EZFZXDNErSeAykHKHO cQX9Anm+yZoExAz3+LtiMaVufqvkpkGhbcQVknYn4Obptr5n38X1vpnlamsHumFrKJFT 2x8lYxKTVr639QuermbLOkCN6nx/iQjuEwuabHQsFKHWqpQZYpzC7v4cHzEfVT7JAHYy WKpg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfI8VlF7gNdXJUA83AHlJ9K8Jlqy/stLIcfnBQcNEh6aP/KiZd Jg7dIGe3N/Ib0f1aXvGsXwKq5bOZftjHdMhVdsdpaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwcughhs+hOBNiI2TbPRoBllhNNSKV6YODyUVFyGosqV6bXeFg7JRQfp3sxhL4JjfqQqnHjax82WYiwSM7UQGE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1068:: with SMTP id y8mr1542693ljm.71.1579088350174; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 03:39:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200115132325.3ac3ca0f@canb.auug.org.au> <20200115212739.474e8272@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200115212739.474e8272@canb.auug.org.au> From: Jean Pihet Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:38:59 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the spi tree To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mark Brown , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen, On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:28 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:10:09 +0100 Jean Pihet wrote: > > > > I did not have this warning, it may be a combination of compiler > > version and build flags. Do you need a fixup patch for it? > > That is up to Mark, really. Unfortunately, Linus will probably get > this warning during the merge window which he will complain about. Ok I just sent a fixup patch to Mark (on spi ML). Could it still reach 5.6? > > It is really weird, as there are three other references to rx_wlen > immediately before the one complained about ... so maybe this is a bug > in the compiler I am using (gcc 9.2.1 from Debian, cross compiler > ppc64le hosted). Yes indeed it is weird. Only some compiler versions are throwing the warning. Thanks, Jean > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell