From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 426E2E00DC6; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:37 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.215.53 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (mail-lf0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CACE00B5F for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t79so11617017lfe.3 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=senic-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cIDOiBoKWeXJFadutJAEgNtjTAdfbO3KdAaseB/wK1Y=; b=mxFvPhqLo2MnXUSc0jh5eQdQrmcd6Ykpgsfl0temj1cdlXPaVR8tYgE5qcU6mmGIXh /ZeKITv9dcZOJ70K3hkDcZMz4Yqfwf+Yb+3iUxorQOeOWszsoq8Ys0Eq2BCuV1h6yNsG vJf9eOYnyvHexFhP2M0LpHhlb79s+h6MiV2yFvPzK/40hQXylWlh8dNCp5SSMClcKpOp zguZbtP1x7Uhxb0vIPp5Ds4Y4ZRG3pqqoiCSifZ34bRudjdAlGJgT4bet1x59UlheyD/ WeKv0HqMPhVOkPYO6/WAQUyP6qVqnXDuhHDo4bli9+WX1CSA3pvzB8rXAacqXZ5b32YA RW/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cIDOiBoKWeXJFadutJAEgNtjTAdfbO3KdAaseB/wK1Y=; b=JWo0+CC7Ll3Jmj6v3JnpObYI9IkKG76lQY985i6SjW/rOYS1zb/rmkeI/XroNPDZYX bvV152RqkGGldoS0ABNnTmPWXyFmehefQIKH7JKQmS++nr3mW7nQ6BPSsDtYCJTR3cMo A+hYvWF5HYo1TrwKxfak3g1VCsaLdGvoUhaqiVh4JD+vLRDaFgoLz/DB0WNS7oMf/q6i 9TBfXDWOqQXw5CE3UEdmexnyBU0JNq8FP+aJwFBWIO9rAoQH0SAPxLDFq2eZBRojo8cR pznI1g5+3TQCeiHcukkC8X3aAvgyxFl9wzXdc8PSLda/76YRkiawL7Ze1wDL519zx8dH Pvvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyteEZGSDE3XO7Is/gZEs9C9qGdJwxe4FFwEqWCXTvyqkXwbQwwea U18jW3ii8ZJREWKGWuLAv2rgAP1paDltootlDVKISTrI X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotTlRZQuB6bYQxn6kPazjpbzv29N0w5Int2eud4iXUoQQjZugIumBwtopzr1uwiQIBXZ+/9TwBAOjUZIjxfre4= X-Received: by 10.46.116.13 with SMTP id p13mr17274281ljc.41.1516286794895; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.27.193 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:46:34 -0800 (PST) From: Alan Martinovic Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:46:34 +0100 Message-ID: To: Yocto-mailing-list Subject: do_roots braking after a SRCREV update for non master branch X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:46:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, I've updated my recipe to use a review from a non master branch: Old version [python3-senichub_git.bb]: inherit setuptools3 PROVIDES += "python3-senic-hub" RPROVIDES_${PN} += "python3-senic-hub" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/getsenic/senic-hub.git;" SRCREV = "01fd5bd8725add5e73d3cc35a169f0dc837daefa" PV = "git-${SRCPV}" RDEPENDS_${PN} = "python3-nuimo python3-lightify" New version [python3-senichub_git.bb]: inherit setuptools3 PROVIDES += "python3-senic-hub" RPROVIDES_${PN} += "python3-senic-hub" S = "${WORKDIR}/git" SRC_URI = "git://github.com/getsenic/senic-hub.git;branch=improve-logging;" SRCREV = "ad6c082a8a990291c6128f54ea0c0d185081704e" PV = "git-${SRCPV}" RDEPENDS_${PN} = "python3-nuimo python3-lightify" So the only changes is the SRCREV, and a specific branch in the SRC_URI. The package alone builds successfully. But when building the image it fails on the do_rootfs: opkg_prepare_url_for_install: Couldn't find anything to satisfy 'python3-senic-hub'. I can't really make the causes of it. There are some legacy naming inconsistencies with a dash, but there is an explicit PROVIDES and RPROVIDES in both recipes, one fails the other passes. Any ideas?