From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1CC3BE007D4; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:22:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.215.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (mail-lf0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8483BE0079D for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:22:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id v9-v6so11346150lfa.11 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:22:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=senic-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qLwfRMs8aEyTAc+er38h4aB2FIqiZ1crnkvGvAMskic=; b=u35RKaOGJPRk5u09NmdbNsbp7FtqDUcgb+fiQB3qHBIbJ7GEUYAJxUQrjKub0lcwqZ qvhPnKOWJybQbft/SfuyJR1XyKwUmcg+UToZ49+I3ThA2vZIcn50xg0fKbDf4CHQOz2y RqLcUrd8L4QOCeKQA+fqdeRrmWLRb7jGd6kxI1Bp98C33RsR04XcaxMvKinPzBKbejjr GWJI3JwiP9hHYZ9XG6SE8EduxhOCh9J/TLlVS/kzm3ocHjNFRdGT2OMDNP/3lbzdqr4s dLTX11gNrzKb1wygrV65z1xDfvcqpTuBNBN3izQGtgS+bZBKiYAoPelNuZbHI43qxVEF mbmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qLwfRMs8aEyTAc+er38h4aB2FIqiZ1crnkvGvAMskic=; b=dBtU4anOeli1JbEyde86KzbOZ4ogk+vfzmbcGAClz94As3Vk1pKyqjhBZfU7B/9WxA VXsvKJTggFC+X2Sm2xfexxVqX3aOASKrFB2LZFmjs5UP89b+x12v2vGAc1WXktWe4A/s UaDUg94G3nmhgdrlwg7/fL2d2on6NurhoAfMrhCq9xOP7XzJDdNScfBCR+q8SfDeYGUG VrNcKCMXp8cePr33q7wfZMRxwkaOY/Qm3J1NHB98G57QzPrlfeDtmS4pHnLw2K1CCD7n NzQP0m16IsYlG+x2L0z4abMaeulcwiggvuz3+CEqE2ivxPx5gC/kkCPOVuK9m1hjzkYA oIrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7F0a6o2C+VEBQo6ei7u1OaE6NDLjs/4WmrdMDJNOPdVC2an6qSV EkCRpc9uJ8IW0t+pMly1T2UV4qIwfknjUj4lJCiL1p+U X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvLUhYbQSWcW6qTJDtTlYxzejvng+lzlBucseKkhOs6xKmKzus7MzgqhhowVqCvHcv5vDYvylrX606/4A+cPS4= X-Received: by 10.46.92.7 with SMTP id q7mr6663584ljb.21.1521134544112; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:22:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a19:1f0f:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:22:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Martinovic Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:22:23 +0100 Message-ID: To: Yocto-mailing-list Subject: Does PACKAGECONFIG only apply to autotools recipes X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:22:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, is it true that that PACKAGECONFIG is only used for recipes that inherit autoconf? Was trying to understand what they do in a recipe: https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/plain/meta/recipes-connectivity/bluez5/bluez5.inc and didn't really get what this was about until found the autoconf reference mentioned in a book. So "features" as referenced in the mega manual: https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.4/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#var-PACKAGECONFIG are the flags that will end up being passed to ./configure? However later in the recipe it's used to populate other variables NOINST_TOOLS = " \ ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'readline', '${NOINST_TOOLS_READLINE}', '', d)} \ ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'testing', '${NOINST_TOOLS_TESTING}', '', d)} \ ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'tools', '${NOINST_TOOLS_BT}', '', d)} \ " Is the original assumption true (that it's an autoconf only thing)? Is there a way to test that by grepping the code (didn't found autoconf references when greping for PACKAGECONFIG in bitbake -e bluez5)? Be Well :)