From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::432; helo=mail-wr1-x432.google.com; envelope-from=derick.montague@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cjPvLnJC"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450Zxz0ZWTzDqRR for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 13:12:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id h4so5762587wre.7 for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:12:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PdPu5Pu4nZvsXgOdNkRIqA+KuLcuflNXdjoMPRNHZ5o=; b=cjPvLnJCaKUS9kuiDGY9CjpC4X1pUIE9Z7UUQp0UWLjiVKb0Hou/ffJ0sMDcL3Uaum KXRqqPX6ZQGd1yYOIScTKCmNNB+fQn+c31l/Vf5j/QeXK0ahhMZySlzxiqzqPnHAVpGW 5Uj9I5yZSu4zY12LpDU7woV+/CIA1wB+bUHcpz1yczgwL9CtjIgicZ3Y2WTj3kuJyr0W qd2nfhsZ2jYqqWcvul/wxx53baJTi4jyM8YT7kUuWmpMMSJPQ5oZQHTCysIFV8iAlHdC MMyvOIsjqoL334EpZLncisEN74wchl96iqdeHnx5dEotrk+ItVol22pSWwKMyKTyVJJX b1kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PdPu5Pu4nZvsXgOdNkRIqA+KuLcuflNXdjoMPRNHZ5o=; b=ekQxqgs/XAYYIArpVXgI2zIKEBifjoA8GbiZbFP0YouYcjjpYgSGEOik7NN3dl6O6i 81ShqnuTr7DTG5q/oBABFnxEG1mAONzWfVga/Kd49Aieh4ShYrcXgXHE5olUJUveeTQD mF+y8qttI8HEa5kYBL+mxqS40p9Izk5QcsM0jNjDQRpwH0bB3xeGBZxXJX8IcrM6LZZG nID58luUdv58cGpfkHXrEX3VK1lzV2vFB4EnZqBzh5tVU4FpIqNdOaxbd2u4P5kgtHq0 xNUSvvwrzsZexZhBBz5E4ytOCKlORo4afskRwofH5dalyUT/zfnnRFRTAbpP3vzBqh28 ChdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVvQN3VaHXwUzBSm8qnCAJpEzz2V/PGrcgPYtavH39scLW75O11 FlRmmvN413XnHppMaT8zPM0Ie4HoffHXlvgH2IhWK3Cy X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzagIxGXfh9GHwR95JlCekyor04lgwU2z3ddrNpAhFeOnRWCowF+GiYUr32nx1k90KXH2xlGnDzeIelEOUsksM= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:518d:: with SMTP id k13mr4152664wrv.285.1557457920527; Thu, 09 May 2019 20:12:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <592E3848-A5D7-45DA-8E20-A3315BE359D9@intel.com> <006052f8-dce3-d523-6d7e-8bb610648deb@intel.com> <865C376D1B77624AAA570EFEF73CE52F94537DF0@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <865C376D1B77624AAA570EFEF73CE52F94537DF0@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Derick Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 22:11:49 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OpenBMC GUI navigation -- User vs Security To: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" Cc: "Khetan, Sharad" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 03:12:09 -0000 > I agree. I would add that =E2=80=9CAccess Control=E2=80=9D is a generic = term (as opposed to =E2=80=9CUser Management=E2=80=9D). This means some oth= er items may potentially fall into this category. This is the last email I could find on this thread. I would like to verify we have reached consensus as we are approaching the time to update the navigational structure from "Users" to "Access Control". Once the "LDAP Settings" and "Certificate Management" work is completed, we will be ready for the change. Current Navigation Structure - Users - Manage User Account Proposed Navigation Structure - Access Control - Certificate Management - LDAP User Management - Local User Management