From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctjTB-0007DK-6l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:27:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctjTA-0000EW-21 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:27:09 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]:33649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctjT9-0000EC-TA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:27:07 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id d188so72712340vka.0 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:27:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Ed Swierk Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:26:26 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] New iotest repros failures on virtio external snapshot with iothread List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow Cc: Fam Zheng , Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:06 PM, John Snow wrote: > On 03/29/2017 10:01 PM, Ed Swierk via Qemu-devel wrote: >> * 2.9.0-rc2 >> - guest, virtio-blk, iothread, single snapshot create+commit: >> "include/block/aio.h:457: aio_enable_external: Assertion >> `ctx->external_disable_cnt > 0' failed." after snapshot create >> - guest, virtio-blk, iothread, repeated snapshot create+commit: same as above >> - guest, virtio-scsi, iothread, single snapshot create+commit: same as above >> - guest, virtio-scsi, iothread, repeated snapshot create+commit: same as above >> - no guest, virtio-blk, iothread, repeated snapshot create+commit: same as above >> - no guest, virtio-scsi, iothread, single snapshot create+commit: same as above >> - no guest, virtio-scsi, iothread, repeated snapshot create+commit: >> same as above > > Do you mean to say that all of these 2.9.0-rc2 cases produce the same > aio.h assertion? Correct. --Ed