From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] igb_uio: use kernel functions for masking MSI-X Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:15:28 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1503336825-7700-1-git-send-email-markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de> <1504613046-7259-1-git-send-email-markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de> <1504613046-7259-5-git-send-email-markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Kavanagh, Mark B" , Markus Theil To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com (mail-pf0-f178.google.com [209.85.192.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C131B1F3 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 23:15:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id b79so6686936pfk.5 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:15:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Are the symbols exported? On Oct 12, 2017 13:58, "Ferruh Yigit" wrote: > On 10/12/2017 11:50 AM, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This commit renders igb_uio unusable on Fedora 20, kernel version > 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64. > > > > During the build (make -j 20), a warning is issued for igb_uio regarding > a missing symbol (pci_msi_unmask): > > WARNING: "pci_msi_unmask_irq" [/home//x86_64- > native-linuxapp-gcc/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.ko] > undefined! > > WARNING: "pci_msi_mask_irq" [/home//x86_64- > native-linuxapp-gcc/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.ko] > undefined! > > > > Hi Mark, > > I can see vanilla 3.19.8 has pci_msi_unmask_irq and pci_msi_mask_irq. > > Also I checked Fedora 3.19.8-100.fc20.x86_64 source code, they are still > there. > > Not sure why getting this error. > > > Subsequently, the module is may not be loaded on account of same. > > (from dmesg): > > [673425.712110] igb_uio: Unknown symbol pci_msi_unmask_irq (err 0) > > [673425.712124] igb_uio: Unknown symbol pci_msi_mask_irq (err 0) > > > > Thanks, > > Mark > > >