From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Collected vdso/vsyscall fixes for 3.1 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:59:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110803135322.GC29501@dumpdata.com> <20110803135604.GA29761@dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110803135604.GA29761@dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, keir.xen@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:53:22AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:31:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > This fixes various problems that cropped up with the vdso patches. >> > >> > =A0- Patch 1 fixes an information leak to userspace. >> > =A0- Patches 2 and 3 fix the kernel build on gold. >> > =A0- Patches 4 and 5 fix Xen (I hope). >> > =A0- Patch 6 (optional) adds a trace event to vsyscall emulation. =A0I= t will >> > =A0 =A0make it easier to handle performance regression reports :) >> >> Hm, you seemed to have the x86 maintainers on your email.. > > I definitly need some coffee. What I meant was that you missing putting > the x86 maintainers on this patchset. They are the ones that will handle = this. > > I put them on the To list for you. Are you sure about that coffee? I'm pretty sure I had x86@kernel.org in th= ere. --Andy