From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA75AC433F5 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1357145AbiASTnm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:43:42 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33088 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241622AbiASTnl (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:43:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B13C06161C for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id a1-20020a17090a688100b001b3fd52338eso3620697pjd.1 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2JxLZ3v4Bv8bpwHY46hEuPtIdRIXaUCCMTr9cL9Lo5Y=; b=nr/v7Bo98eaUcUQlYthkka1KhZlp1Ut7bIDqOHADDCwAs/NYO/PVuJCoawnGAiknTO 5Jv2cD0EOg4fYZmS2HjiPFvpq+uyAPHyBvIXV/mhsHb7FRwH/siAKDtGVjYEl8f86oGQ HvKQo2qtWrxEmlPjwgrrn3iDMbmTUqwKifIHUPxcYsMl/BTDZTY2Ev0t5n5NM5G9aPp6 gRVFwE5XuUxm/vTIw1yQpHfaYimX+8kYiarmziRxG3O6dnniK+gdLhfQtMdHUkDP+HGx AL6YkvxFK4wf3lNdSgMBH6GnCt2MsAjCJA+Bsi/zeO5tBtKPJi+AFjcEiVjBL+a1GSh3 seEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2JxLZ3v4Bv8bpwHY46hEuPtIdRIXaUCCMTr9cL9Lo5Y=; b=fufAEfpfQZQ07BqLJuNCEKVgKJ0qma89HPUSMCDeJPIMECSuQz2JEsmqH1BE8EqmRU YJSusK2lCxxwg791QqNbe7Cq+66UWvsCq7SSIlm14X8G0e5sBu1ZpwhXTJBHjH76gV/g uaFqagTbXoYs/IcbVn9HOcH76oV2Ie6wPcISktdkYzf0l2nxBfTHebxd64obXUuh7ZZZ emde7lApvbirEseYxTiKB0LwmZaojjlIJT2B1NcU1Zoeqe4ndw3rOZhxQ7QXkM7v/POW 8fHXJ0OvsFxiEQaxPVHWokKivMiLG9WESYu1UO7APSpTHZjHVxS31XR8r5FzdWhijdSA HEPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531614SQv7satGlr1qCWvGqkp3cS9cIYjc9TdaAebFlf+NdXop+m fyJgdcknxBudBzKzI6aRgJkrwRTqTODoFqne/49FLQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXe7dJBFGrUenkqyUD6H0dibuwp58ksM51ItRoH4Zy7bxRPIQnoXriKBjPW4d8ewisdP6mPWQrBBWm0Ma26FY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b947:b0:14a:a6aa:4fa6 with SMTP id h7-20020a170902b94700b0014aa6aa4fa6mr21067587pls.149.1642621420467; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Sam Protsenko , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:01 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > > > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in > > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. > > > > > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in > > > the soc tree, > > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. > > > > Yep, will be sent up today most likely. > > > > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the > > > contents (anything > > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended > > > up in the "late" branch. > > > > > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen > > > no indication of any problems so far. > > > > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes > > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional > > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the > > late branch gets merged. :) > > Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to > base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I > wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach? If needed you can base it on Linus' last merge commit of arm-soc contents for the first set of fixes (or your topic branch that you sent the code up on), but it's also OK to wait if they're minor bugs/fixes. -Olof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8634BC433EF for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:45:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=8FHfLUQf0qACGvHOJALpOgDmRuAUA0oXC5zEFAujibc=; b=NHypcWC4mGhdO/ 8wen1f8m97YrVQsuRQykNhHPq7IS5/kbkGfy4iq3reQBwfLGbYr+z0OKRuRirpUm+tL/KPGrfbTXa vz1sgSGS9X05jrmEGUG4He5vB1Fj5JqeOtEVthxP74lPLFyoN1RtMBZ36I/ey0DOlMwCzBrJKCGCY ARikLrNA0Msu88biWqS9T0t79f6C895YH1a/HNWeFLEnwN4PM2QpmPRj7lIPz5Krgo0bztWaeXTwO k77cNcVT6HgRz2kKu/D31vWLuPqjylowYw8vRV8LiIZ3G3GUg/tw0kQv5wJ4ss1P9Bs94dXVI0c6o ZyNFrxJX2O3faFfo4mzQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nAGry-0076vT-8u; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:43:46 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nAGru-0076uN-AH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:43:43 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id l7so340566pls.6 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2JxLZ3v4Bv8bpwHY46hEuPtIdRIXaUCCMTr9cL9Lo5Y=; b=nr/v7Bo98eaUcUQlYthkka1KhZlp1Ut7bIDqOHADDCwAs/NYO/PVuJCoawnGAiknTO 5Jv2cD0EOg4fYZmS2HjiPFvpq+uyAPHyBvIXV/mhsHb7FRwH/siAKDtGVjYEl8f86oGQ HvKQo2qtWrxEmlPjwgrrn3iDMbmTUqwKifIHUPxcYsMl/BTDZTY2Ev0t5n5NM5G9aPp6 gRVFwE5XuUxm/vTIw1yQpHfaYimX+8kYiarmziRxG3O6dnniK+gdLhfQtMdHUkDP+HGx AL6YkvxFK4wf3lNdSgMBH6GnCt2MsAjCJA+Bsi/zeO5tBtKPJi+AFjcEiVjBL+a1GSh3 seEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2JxLZ3v4Bv8bpwHY46hEuPtIdRIXaUCCMTr9cL9Lo5Y=; b=GBdV/64CLWLBzlQ6CIdZDYxgYxK0NBnQLCLRelw57cewGhT2PDniMVNLWsxZrsM/iu 57bHfBiBycrbnRkVbSw0pMreLcJx4p/fK53rBe6/nS8FoOYVudhBOKqgoGv8IcRxG1IK q5tHJRVl3NjM8jMsRRpVNg+A5JrNiLJANT+L3DXaUUw79J1QJKzudUJk7XWhm1Y+mzct D+omaIVgORuFQyVg6TJTQgrMEPwVi1vOeTK/w2T3N1x1Yj7XBNPuH2cxm1sYTS95RaCx UfPbIkhWyoGoqVyUj63JrulXCU4cGNW01caIBzreuTtgNvvNNKHotVf3IBBdkAAKY0Nn Pdwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533X0MDf01m7YrxM9fqRH8fl94j87m0Z+2mn5knyGdnRBtfAgUOt xzxSRcaT34oflx3jCx2CyQmSiT6OG7N7EGZ1ori9XQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXe7dJBFGrUenkqyUD6H0dibuwp58ksM51ItRoH4Zy7bxRPIQnoXriKBjPW4d8ewisdP6mPWQrBBWm0Ma26FY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b947:b0:14a:a6aa:4fa6 with SMTP id h7-20020a170902b94700b0014aa6aa4fa6mr21067587pls.149.1642621420467; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:43:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Sam Protsenko , arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220119_114342_431673_58F41B1C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.10 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 9:01 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > > > > > > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in > > > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. > > > > > > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in > > > the soc tree, > > > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. > > > > Yep, will be sent up today most likely. > > > > > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the > > > contents (anything > > > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended > > > up in the "late" branch. > > > > > > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen > > > no indication of any problems so far. > > > > Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes > > coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional > > fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the > > late branch gets merged. :) > > Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to > base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I > wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach? If needed you can base it on Linus' last merge commit of arm-soc contents for the first set of fixes (or your topic branch that you sent the code up on), but it's also OK to wait if they're minor bugs/fixes. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel