On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Jonathan Cameron <
jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 18 October 2016 09:35:06 BST, Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >Hi Jonathan,
> >
> >2016-09-03 19:21 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>:
> >> On 01/09/16 08:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Given this dependency I'm assuming the best route for these is
> >via
> >>>>>>>>> the MFD tree...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Lee, shout if you want them to go a different route.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IIO looks like a more suitable route.  Please provide me with a
> >>>>>>>> pull-request base off of an immutable tag.
> >>>>>>> Hi Lee,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As far as I can tell the precursor patch above hasn't gone in
> >your
> >>>>>>> tree yet which leaves me unable to take this through IIO for
> >now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Maybe I'm missing something!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jonathan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Lee,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any movement on the dependency above?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Last I can find was you adding your ack to it:
> >>>>>> [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: cros_ec: Add MKBP event support
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/423
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well that's annoying.  Okay, well when I send out the pull-request
> >for
> >>>>> this one, I will include you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually, better still -- take all of them on one branch and I
> >will
> >>>>> pull from you.  Saves the toing and froing.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Sure. Will probably be the weekend before I get this sorted.
> >>>
> >>> No rush.
> >>>
> >> Ah, I see you ended up with an immutable branch of this anyway:
> >> your ib-mfd-input-4.9 branch.
> >> I'll build an immutable branch on that
> >> ib-iio-mfd-4.9 in iio.git.
> >>
> >
> >Nice, I just saw that the dependencies for this patch series are
> >already in mainline, thanks.
> >
> >I don't see the patches in your iio tree, need I to rebase the patch
> >series on top of mainline and send v5 or you are already taking care
> >about it?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >  Enric.
> >
> >
> >> Unfortunately I don't have an Ack for patch 4 from Olof yet so
> >> can't take that and until I do, the rest makes little sense as
> >> it's not enabled.
> Still looking for an Ack from Olof I think...
>
> Perhaps pm him to get him to take a look.
> I doubt much reading is needed but feel free to confirm that!
>

Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>


Apologies for the severe delays here. I don't have hardware to test on for
this, so I have to rely on others to vouch for functionality. I hope to
transition maintainership to someone that can pay closer attention soon.


-Olof