From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBC9C4CE61 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05739246B2 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="dDlTY+Hg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729402AbgB0SdW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:33:22 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f66.google.com ([209.85.166.66]:33888 "EHLO mail-io1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729306AbgB0SdW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:33:22 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f66.google.com with SMTP id z190so581836iof.1 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E7WO/NUxGv82Kf1dVrT+16+HfZ68MhNea8HytDwhqyw=; b=dDlTY+HgwgsvQ5xJ8+Hk1X+IRSOVAMCit/kiKPiZmFv2sjbZZqgHkNQR/RafnMCRZY hwdlikXVytW/mOAzi/NlUvfQpKaIriHabsmG/zfSsACtuxMuAPVHZYFo2wN/HW+SYNsQ 9OslPFaPXicUrUv+kQQGObGg7bXRXoMuaKmD5jiuAzXD7xqnp+XjAE5I1yXeUMaF+WAf QXF0zuZMsdxBDgteXJHgLBFj6MD5AaKn+QIEHppS9A9BkWkrOeQsILX1HzZ9AYXkYHJX YRJ0RWxZdIW/QslG3vFML8SuUSTcYpAS8+YgE+6/wrlyjqYp9myE9D/RFX4hhzdK619u pKbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E7WO/NUxGv82Kf1dVrT+16+HfZ68MhNea8HytDwhqyw=; b=UMhfL0Ge99QdYIa9FSlBoOgSn04hxuVNnL/LMSnE3c/u7/MmoA3EICL7kdnIp3Dgmd aw0VPUUfPm8Nn6RIZyiqtcHIni1kyv1xYXddqzRZtte7W/FmVcrkcCWA2PeOSFG1WP9V +DqO1lo6twJaLCJtx2gxd7AzwP6t4FhnQim2RFcOKNRARnorkMYdKrJkiqEjzjmRHfHj RIyatEHLOjOLRLtD0CTBvaZbHsz2G8E7okntWz3bqmgQtQ91q3wsRyUtlfP7fA5HQig3 h2OcZWFla/Y22IY+IQpNTIjgpePqI9aQrZ501qGLkXadKqwS0r3iUMpAxhClT2Sbx82A /ItA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvDDyrDd4Z00F3GUX2rjf+no9bjPzbZFE4bfp/ZSUrrQ++i0Md 8KAjE02nj8v614BfvjNOfdFYhjU83d/nS45Lii7BQg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0JZSMiGAn9FLjoYzJKMf64V4rXpI5AxwNpHCGrUsfgeFrJ/5Bi1clENFNl5NoGK6MW/yqNoXQYEb7zczBpL8= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d614:: with SMTP id w20mr496610iom.278.1582828401861; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:33:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:33:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] Renesas SoC updates for v5.7 To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , arm-soc , arm-soc , Magnus Damm , Linux ARM , Linux-Renesas , users@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates > > > for v5.7. > > > > > > It consists of 5 parts: > > > > Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5. > > Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end > > up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't). > > Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series. > > I do see them all of them at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/, > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ? > Lore also has them: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b > > Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar > problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but > never in my (Gmail) inbox. This is how the email I got looked like: From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: "Linuxkernel+Patchwork-Soc via Email Integration" Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: [GIT PULL 1/5] Renesas ARM DT updates for v5.7 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:02:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20200226110221.19288-2-geert+renesas@glider.be> In-Reply-To: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: Sender: patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org List-Id: Mailing-List: list patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org; contact patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Delivered-To: mailing list Reply-To: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org It no longer had the {arm,soc}@kernel.org recipients on it, instead the internal-only mailing list that connects soc@kernel.org with patchwork. Very odd. Reply-to rewrites are undesirable too. Konstantin, anything on your side that can shed light on this? My mail filters locally expects to see soc@kernel.org and arm@kernel.org recipients still intact in the to-line, and it's really odd that 2 of the 5 emails looked as expected. -Olof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE1BC11D3D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918C8246C9 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="qE/0oPt/"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="dDlTY+Hg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 918C8246C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Q5PJ8m+vP0ut7epUrjcnwHrr/++gQU4jR2QHWL825io=; b=qE/0oPt/evyljb JYqW+TH3jwRK8LO+TCGTx6HZxMd3JEjY2iYWTweyylL+PFf4WChgIlftvO28a/PigCQKH/vtg2wOD 83JulDMyR/ecHPIYWWF7vqpY2/eGCfT4CTTvnxAJDDaTJQoZsIZquq4RtK1uWkGHNHfLdpvkSJH08 fwlTgSot7W73Eh1NOn2tL4ZuQMODn1O2W1alHyRYFE1dgB0p6yoAyvOD7w3rs/orwYW8NJM9OzNID bP482+rqunhemx22Ilve3q+aaPeS7hvX5Ru/y0dQaWzaEPkU9mFVMtS/4IsHFsvFl4oU9eOG/yNgK oSSGOq9P5ffk5fAnJo2w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7NyP-0008CI-Dy; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:33:25 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7NyM-0008Bk-Su for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:33:24 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id c17so560678ioc.4 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:33:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E7WO/NUxGv82Kf1dVrT+16+HfZ68MhNea8HytDwhqyw=; b=dDlTY+HgwgsvQ5xJ8+Hk1X+IRSOVAMCit/kiKPiZmFv2sjbZZqgHkNQR/RafnMCRZY hwdlikXVytW/mOAzi/NlUvfQpKaIriHabsmG/zfSsACtuxMuAPVHZYFo2wN/HW+SYNsQ 9OslPFaPXicUrUv+kQQGObGg7bXRXoMuaKmD5jiuAzXD7xqnp+XjAE5I1yXeUMaF+WAf QXF0zuZMsdxBDgteXJHgLBFj6MD5AaKn+QIEHppS9A9BkWkrOeQsILX1HzZ9AYXkYHJX YRJ0RWxZdIW/QslG3vFML8SuUSTcYpAS8+YgE+6/wrlyjqYp9myE9D/RFX4hhzdK619u pKbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E7WO/NUxGv82Kf1dVrT+16+HfZ68MhNea8HytDwhqyw=; b=Avq5snrLbDAxBxdMjiHWWxjXwuJHpa2nGQyGBsXx8QEnNnsycXEHf9afOFD/sw1eh6 L9Av34ZGjglkMGaXWYq8Qv02SEv2zeVP+A2BeP3PDUskF09G+PVqel3x+ODTToTME5Pe 6FJ4y1tai/XsjJgnkNhEY5TAztba2HEDhvybwh4Kb4Y9t+f2LIEdJYtZ3vCNyqdSi2hN btiUKvBEFVojNaffKbD2Y1jv+IubewL0LtZxzHe/SqjLWA2LDKMTVErpyzap8r0RqY14 AN6BFl1E7K5lrQSHodeb5qFxbMiSHAX58UcVXT02U/3QYEjDLsvWOEK6BVOSiIGNuJlw 2LYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXQRBtJOTp9k5msbpFv0zuF2Gke5POLCXP7CIsniT2FIQHR/Osy 2B9IXNC5wxxFUNhVSt14vkqWNQ2A5z4Uj7+i0d47UQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0JZSMiGAn9FLjoYzJKMf64V4rXpI5AxwNpHCGrUsfgeFrJ/5Bi1clENFNl5NoGK6MW/yqNoXQYEb7zczBpL8= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d614:: with SMTP id w20mr496610iom.278.1582828401861; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:33:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost> In-Reply-To: From: Olof Johansson Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:33:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] Renesas SoC updates for v5.7 To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Konstantin Ryabitsev X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200227_103322_933317_51471578 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.93 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Linux-Renesas , users@linux.kernel.org, arm-soc , arm-soc , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates > > > for v5.7. > > > > > > It consists of 5 parts: > > > > Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5. > > Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end > > up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't). > > Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series. > > I do see them all of them at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/, > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ? > Lore also has them: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b > > Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar > problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but > never in my (Gmail) inbox. This is how the email I got looked like: From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: "Linuxkernel+Patchwork-Soc via Email Integration" Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: [GIT PULL 1/5] Renesas ARM DT updates for v5.7 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:02:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20200226110221.19288-2-geert+renesas@glider.be> In-Reply-To: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: Sender: patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org List-Id: Mailing-List: list patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org; contact patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Delivered-To: mailing list Reply-To: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org It no longer had the {arm,soc}@kernel.org recipients on it, instead the internal-only mailing list that connects soc@kernel.org with patchwork. Very odd. Reply-to rewrites are undesirable too. Konstantin, anything on your side that can shed light on this? My mail filters locally expects to see soc@kernel.org and arm@kernel.org recipients still intact in the to-line, and it's really odd that 2 of the 5 emails looked as expected. -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel