From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753246AbdBDAIf (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:08:35 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f195.google.com ([209.85.216.195]:35152 "EHLO mail-qt0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751582AbdBDAIe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:08:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [209.133.79.6] In-Reply-To: <1482169657-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> References: <1482169657-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> From: Olof Johansson Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:08:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: print timer value at init time To: Mark Rutland , Marc Zyngier Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Olof Johansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > This is useful to get an indication of how much time we spent in firmware. > > It's not guaranteed that the timer started at 0 on reset, so it's just > an approximation, and might very well be invalid on some systems. But > it's still a useful metric to have access to. > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson Friendly ping. Would be nice to see this land in 4.11. Thanks, -Olof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:08:32 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: print timer value at init time In-Reply-To: <1482169657-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> References: <1482169657-15773-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > This is useful to get an indication of how much time we spent in firmware. > > It's not guaranteed that the timer started at 0 on reset, so it's just > an approximation, and might very well be invalid on some systems. But > it's still a useful metric to have access to. > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson Friendly ping. Would be nice to see this land in 4.11. Thanks, -Olof