All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, eyal@mips.com, zenon@mips.com,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: make pci_claim_resource() work with conflict resources as appropriate
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:35:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOfQC9-0d+W0GyLAtEMEFFAzPpsZxpzZ0UPAqLo2AokF3zdfAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5hZGAzc17GApEfuzduvzh6haVLBKRvizcRxGLnh8ebuA@mail.gmail.com>

Well, here are dmesg and /proc/ioports *BEFORE* applying the patch:

...
...
pci 0000:00:0a.0: [8086:7110] type 0 class 0x000601
pci 0000:00:0a.1: [8086:7111] type 0 class 0x000101
pci 0000:00:0a.1: reg 20: [io  0x1240-0x124f]
pci 0000:00:0a.2: [8086:7112] type 0 class 0x000c03
pci 0000:00:0a.2: reg 20: [io  0x1220-0x123f]
pci 0000:00:0a.3: [8086:7113] type 0 class 0x000680
pci 0000:00:0a.3: address space collision: [io  0x1000-0x103f]
conflicts with MSC PCI I/O [io  0x1000-0xffffff]
pci 0000:00:0a.3: address space collision: [io  0x1100-0x110f]
conflicts with MSC PCI I/O [io  0x1000-0xffffff]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: [1022:2000] type 0 class 0x000200
pci 0000:00:0b.0: reg 10: [io  0x1200-0x121f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: reg 14: [mem 0x10000000-0x1000001f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: reg 30: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:00:0b.0: PME# disabled
pci 0000:00:11.0: [153f:0001] type 0 class 0x000600
pci 0000:00:11.0: reg 10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0fffffff]
pci 0000:00:0a.3: BAR 13: [io  0x1000-0x103f] has bogus alignment
pci 0000:00:0a.3: BAR 14: [io  0x1100-0x110f] has bogus alignment
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x10000000-0x100fffff pref]
pci 0000:00:0a.2: BAR 4: assigned [io  0x1000-0x101f]
pci 0000:00:0a.2: BAR 4: set to [io  0x1000-0x101f] (PCI address
[0x1000-0x101f])
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 0: assigned [io  0x1020-0x103f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 0: set to [io  0x1020-0x103f] (PCI address
[0x1020-0x103f])
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 1: assigned [mem 0x10100000-0x1010001f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 1: set to [mem 0x10100000-0x1010001f] (PCI
address [0x10100000-0x1010001f])
pci 0000:00:0a.1: BAR 4: assigned [io  0x1040-0x104f]
pci 0000:00:0a.1: BAR 4: set to [io  0x1040-0x104f] (PCI address
[0x1040-0x104f])
...
...
pcnet32: pcnet32.c:v1.35 21.Apr.2008 tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
pcnet32: No access methods
...
...

-sh-4.0# cat /proc/ioports
00000000-0000001f : dma1
00000020-00000021 : pic1
00000040-0000005f : timer
00000060-0000006f : keyboard
00000070-00000077 : rtc_cmos
00000080-0000008f : dma page reg
000000a0-000000a1 : pic2
000000c0-000000df : dma2
00000170-00000177 : piix
000001f0-000001f7 : piix
000002f8-000002ff : serial
00000376-00000376 : piix
000003f6-000003f6 : piix
000003f8-000003ff : serial
00001000-00ffffff : MSC PCI I/O
  00001000-0000101f : 0000:00:0a.2
  00001020-0000103f : 0000:00:0b.0
  00001040-0000104f : 0000:00:0a.1
    00001040-0000104f : piix

And *AFTER* applying the patch:

...
...
pci 0000:00:0a.0: [8086:7110] type 0 class 0x000601
pci 0000:00:0a.1: [8086:7111] type 0 class 0x000101
pci 0000:00:0a.1: reg 20: [io  0x1240-0x124f]
pci 0000:00:0a.2: [8086:7112] type 0 class 0x000c03
pci 0000:00:0a.2: reg 20: [io  0x1220-0x123f]
pci 0000:00:0a.3: [8086:7113] type 0 class 0x000680
pci 0000:00:0a.3: quirk: [io  0x1000-0x103f] claimed by PIIX4 ACPI
pci 0000:00:0a.3: quirk: [io  0x1100-0x110f] claimed by PIIX4 SMB
pci 0000:00:0b.0: [1022:2000] type 0 class 0x000200
pci 0000:00:0b.0: reg 10: [io  0x1200-0x121f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: reg 14: [mem 0x10000000-0x1000001f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: reg 30: [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:00:0b.0: PME# disabled
pci 0000:00:11.0: [153f:0001] type 0 class 0x000600
pci 0000:00:11.0: reg 10: [mem 0x00000000-0x0fffffff]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x10000000-0x100fffff pref]
pci 0000:00:0a.2: BAR 4: assigned [io  0x1040-0x105f]
pci 0000:00:0a.2: BAR 4: set to [io  0x1040-0x105f] (PCI address
[0x1040-0x105f])
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 0: assigned [io  0x1060-0x107f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 0: set to [io  0x1060-0x107f] (PCI address
[0x1060-0x107f])
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 1: assigned [mem 0x10100000-0x1010001f]
pci 0000:00:0b.0: BAR 1: set to [mem 0x10100000-0x1010001f] (PCI
address [0x10100000-0x1010001f])
pci 0000:00:0a.1: BAR 4: assigned [io  0x1080-0x108f]
pci 0000:00:0a.1: BAR 4: set to [io  0x1080-0x108f] (PCI address
[0x1080-0x108f])
...
...
pcnet32: pcnet32.c:v1.35 21.Apr.2008 tsbogend@alpha.franken.de
pcnet32: PCnet/FAST III 79C973 at 0x1060, 00:d0:a0:00:06:72 assigned IRQ 10
pcnet32: Found PHY 0000:6b60 at address 30
pcnet32: eth0: registered as PCnet/FAST III 79C973
pcnet32: 1 cards_found
...
...

-sh-4.0# cat /proc/ioports
00000000-0000001f : dma1
00000020-00000021 : pic1
00000040-0000005f : timer
00000060-0000006f : keyboard
00000070-00000077 : rtc_cmos
00000080-0000008f : dma page reg
000000a0-000000a1 : pic2
000000c0-000000df : dma2
00000170-00000177 : piix
000001f0-000001f7 : piix
000002f8-000002ff : serial
00000376-00000376 : piix
000003f6-000003f6 : piix
000003f8-000003ff : serial
00001000-00ffffff : MSC PCI I/O
  00001000-0000103f : 0000:00:0a.3
  00001040-0000105f : 0000:00:0a.2
  00001060-0000107f : 0000:00:0b.0
    00001060-0000107f : pcnet32_probe_pci
  00001080-0000108f : 0000:00:0a.1
    00001080-0000108f : piix
  00001100-0000110f : 0000:00:0a.3

> Did something change the order in which we claim resources, so things that
> used to work now cause conflicts?

It used to work (as I see on 2.6.29) because the function insert_resource() was
used. The /proc/ioports of 2.6.29 has exactly the same contents as that of the
patched kernel.

> I think insert_resource() (where the newly-inserted resource can become the
> parent of something that was previously inserted) is sort of a hack...

Yes, agree, though in this case the newly-inserted resource actually becomes the
child of a previously inserted one, the MIPS System Controller's PCI I/O. So,
talking about sticking to using request_resource_conflict() as apposed to
insert_resource_conflict(), the problem is, like what I mentioned in my reply to
Ralf, why pci_find_parent_resource() does not return MSC PCI I/O but return the
root. If MSC PCI I/O is supposed to be the parent of PCI quirks, then something
is wrong somewhere else. Or else, the start point of MSC PCI I/O might be
raised to avoid the collisions.


Deng-Cheng

2011/7/28 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In resolving a network driver issue with the MIPS Malta platform, the root
>> cause was traced into pci_claim_resource():
>>
>> MIPS System Controller's PCI I/O resources stay in 0x1000-0xffffff. When
>> PCI quirks start claiming resources using request_resource_conflict(),
>> collisions happen and -EBUSY is returned, thereby rendering the onboard AMD
>> PCnet32 NIC unaware of quirks' region and preventing the NIC from functioning.
>> For PCI quirks, PIIX4 ACPI is expected to claim 0x1000-0x103f, and PIIX4 SMB to
>> claim 0x1100-0x110f, both of which fall into the MSC I/O range. Certainly, we
>> can increase the start point of this range in arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-pci.c to
>> avoid the collisions. But a fix in here looks more justified, though it seems to
>> have a wider impact. Using insert_xxx as opposed to request_xxx will register
>> PCI quirks' resources as children of MSC I/O and return OK, instead of seeing
>> collisions which are actually resolvable.
>
> What's the collision?  Can we see the dmesg log (which should have
> that information) and maybe the /proc/ioports contents?  Did something
> change the order in which we claim resources, so things that used to
> work now cause conflicts?
>
> I think insert_resource() (where the newly-inserted resource can
> become the parent of something that was previously inserted) is sort
> of a hack, and the fact that we need it is telling us that we're doing
> things in the wrong order.  It's nicer when we can discover and claim
> resources in a top-down hierarchical way.  But I recognize that may
> not always be possible, or at least not convenient.
>
> Bjorn
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-29  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28 11:28 [PATCH 0/2] PCI driver to use insert_resource_conflict() to claim resources Deng-Cheng Zhu
2011-07-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: make pci_claim_resource() work with conflict resources as appropriate Deng-Cheng Zhu
2011-07-28 11:53   ` Ralf Baechle
2011-07-29  5:33     ` Deng-Cheng Zhu
2011-07-29  6:32     ` Deng-Cheng Zhu
2011-07-29 17:35       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-08-01 10:13         ` Deng-Cheng Zhu
2011-08-01 15:21           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-07-28 15:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-07-29  6:35     ` Deng-Cheng Zhu [this message]
2011-07-28 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] kernel/resource: enrich the comment for insert_resource_conflict() Deng-Cheng Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOfQC9-0d+W0GyLAtEMEFFAzPpsZxpzZ0UPAqLo2AokF3zdfAw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=eyal@mips.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zenon@mips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.