From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyNB8-0008Jq-5o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:44:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyNB2-0004Zw-7z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:44:46 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:52631) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RyNB1-0004Zs-UD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:44:40 -0500 Received: by obbup16 with SMTP id up16so4932063obb.4 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:44:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4F3E41F4.8090407@suse.de> References: <1328237992-14953-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1328237992-14953-15-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <4F3E41F4.8090407@suse.de> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:44:39 +0100 Message-ID: From: andrzej zaborowski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 14/21] target-arm: Move the PXA270's iwMMXt reset to pxa270_reset() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook On 17 February 2012 13:03, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 17.02.2012 10:59, schrieb andrzej zaborowski: >> On 3 February 2012 03:59, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >>> No other emulated CPU uses this at this time. >> >> But why does this code better fit in hw/ than target-arm? =C2=A0The iwMM= Xt >> registers are core registers after all. > > It seems you've misread something here. This is all in target-arm. :) Yes, I did, sorry. I had looked at the whole series previously, forgotten it, then looked at this patch that was still in my inbox without any of the context. ... > The final plan for rnpn is to have two QOM properties and to request a > "pxa270" CPU, then set the revision since there are no functional > dependencies on the revision at all. (cc'ing Paul) > I've actually compile-tested and grep'ed this. > Sounds reasonable. > > Please note also the following v4 that came out of an IRC discussion: > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/commitdiff/1262acf06308cf2bde46520d= 0238548cb73c79fe > If you need the JTAG_ID somewhere please let us know soon. No, it's not used anywhere (obviously otherwise it wouldn't be a comment) Cheers