From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752223AbdJ0KAw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 27 Oct 2017 06:00:52 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:56823 "EHLO
        mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752103AbdJ0KAu (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 27 Oct 2017 06:00:50 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QjSNY0XqomaHsS0qJzj6KxzaKUGUMzZ8zfrOSy8dORiscal1XJ+DiFNOf3e39pU1fVfsB086ucJhbQUwtxCFI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171027084505.GB25695@kroah.com>
References: <1507981006-7430-1-git-send-email-pintu.ping@gmail.com>
 <1508801195-5369-1-git-send-email-pintu.ping@gmail.com> <CAOuPNLhM79etdg61JsaceH1xtR3E6vsXBSEaMRmJTWzaeqgOxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171027084505.GB25695@kroah.com>
From: Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:30:47 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOuPNLgcDJKJPpkQcw9gKStpbXZKB126dvJB4GaTfsxnP5uKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 1/1] [tools/selftests]: android/ion: userspace test
 utility for ion buffer sharing
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, shuah@kernel.org,
        dvhart@infradead.org, Bamvor Zhang Jian <bamvor.zhangjian@linaro.org>,
        Pintu Kumar <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:04:49AM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote:
>> Dear Laura, Shuah,
>>
>> Request you to please review the PATCHv4.
>
> A response with only 3 days, while everyone is traveling at conferences,
> is a bit unexpected.  Give people a chance to catch up, a week at the
> least is the minimum response time...
>

Ok got it. This was just a reminder :)


> thanks,
>
> greg k-h