From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AC7C433F5 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2C76108F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 19:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229469AbhIPTXA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:23:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58248 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229455AbhIPTXA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:23:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72247C061574 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id g184so7145110pgc.6 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:21:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K5TUDsoQrDyjua0csZZrPk5aV5feI+9Pn9Q40t9YT3E=; b=TwvOq3D8IsHBEHdNYoj0Dyjn2sV5Puez+nF6VgrlC8ISMDfbmrb83XmW/vt3JlLfoS 3VTaUryeoYVnkXaLt7shzQx7ma+YbWlH/1mQUiQjmIN0wJYcxUuTRfsdtytE30S8OcRH l449caWmjgrcH21VKnwp+lbVJAtzh+YV7+G27eqXlMeJQ0PzE3cl5L6jKU3kkOTtNXtM Zz9QjTDFUFFOmhMl4GHdhIOAkkwyngK3488ZAjAn7q+ADUeG4mId6N0M9DyASJ3f07nN FZjUej7ugH2Rymn+EW7WyN+QzZOHebifYZhwJg6m7ZPnkffbSfYX2/oBUlZfMOC8wUEb 5lIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K5TUDsoQrDyjua0csZZrPk5aV5feI+9Pn9Q40t9YT3E=; b=TLY/kxOysqCQC2JIuwv2CoY4WjOlLIhxZrJHE1wRLIyR8Kbs0YgOJr8Vj/fBICIRlO pUCnFYVcM1W6rRJOmoYpa+Xm7e5/QmmKofJfZBOJbA2lRGxQZXPoHBpakiPri5++5Iru qb3LdNXD4QG5XNVZP7e0x5S8o15rAoxrIt6UIqaY6qf5fWmrckOJFkaY7YFKuXujdG8y 6qMh9L4LqEUwoCkQrGQ9UEbAtFQZc3wlBh6JFJ3phe99gmDT2bzQQKtYExp7Y2jRZMCj Ljf8w0/dut3tGMSeFBh7qrUKQA+MFIKods6FBVHSysxOkCoWSEDTIx0U4vsbtTzToCnN u8ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Xly0T6jZLXiM7Gv6VFhzScY3vT8g+SLM9d2Knt7vP0dL7/pCc JbRPzG4aqCyhxsdYhYBN/CKuWuj3MRC3jvp0guA5TOUh X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvcWM/IBGcvIgVHnfkdgRY5clUENQLvzA8eO5dTEWT0mZ6cfjGpgakcCoAIRvOgf+FWjacmwQaENWqFc0G08M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:14c4:b0:412:444e:f600 with SMTP id w4-20020a056a0014c400b00412444ef600mr6925298pfu.83.1631820098883; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:21:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mike Javorski Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:21:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS server regression in kernel 5.13 (tested w/ 5.13.9) To: Chuck Lever III Cc: Mel Gorman , Neil Brown , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the insight Chuck. I will give it a bit more time as you suggest; I will ask if the arch devs can pull in the fix to their kernel in the meantime. I didn't see anyone making "backport fixes" requests in the stable list archive recently, so it doesn't seem to be the norm, but I don't see any other methods. - mike On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:58 AM Chuck Lever III wrote: > > > > > On Sep 15, 2021, at 10:45 PM, Mike Javorski wrote: > > > > Chuck: > > > > I see that the patch was merged to Linus' branch, but there have been > > 2 stable patch releases since and the patch hasn't been pulled in. > > The v5.15 merge window just closed on Monday. I'm sure there is a > long queue of fixes to be pulled into stable. I'd give it more time. > > > > You > > mentioned I should reach out to the stable maintainers in this > > instance, is the stable@vger.kernel.org list the appropriate place to > > make such a request? > > That could be correct, but the automated process has worked for me > long enough that I'm no longer sure how to make such a request. > > -- > Chuck Lever > > >