From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932356AbcHVUbD (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:31:03 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:36287 "EHLO mail-yb0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752487AbcHVUbC (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:31:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> References: <1471454452-2151-1-git-send-email-seanpaul@chromium.org> <57B57AFE.2030706@rock-chips.com> <20160818091141.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> From: Sean Paul Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:30:38 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number To: Mark yao Cc: Tomasz Figa , dri-devel , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id u7MKV7I0018256 On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao wrote: > On 2016年08月18日 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote: >>> >>> >Hi Sean >>> > >>> >Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support. >>> > >>> >But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are deprecated, >>> >I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon. >> >> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream patches >> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with >> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development. >> -Daniel >> > Yeah, Sorry for that. > > In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399 > patches are based on them, > but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches, Sean's patches is > old version. > > I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to > upstream. > but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) . > > merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches. > Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then? Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that depends on these changes. Sean > Thanks. > > -- > Ｍark Yao > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Paul Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:30:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1471454452-2151-1-git-send-email-seanpaul@chromium.org> <57B57AFE.2030706@rock-chips.com> <20160818091141.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Mark yao Cc: Linux ARM Kernel , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel , Tomasz Figa List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org T24gVGh1LCBBdWcgMTgsIDIwMTYgYXQgNjowMiBBTSwgTWFyayB5YW8gPG1hcmsueWFvQHJvY2st Y2hpcHMuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKPiBPbiAyMDE25bm0MDjmnIgxOOaXpSAxNzoxMSwgRGFuaWVsIFZl dHRlciB3cm90ZToKPj4KPj4gT24gVGh1LCBBdWcgMTgsIDIwMTYgYXQgMDU6MDg6MTRQTSArMDgw MCwgTWFyayB5YW8gd3JvdGU6Cj4+Pgo+Pj4gPkhpIFNlYW4KPj4+ID4KPj4+ID5UaGFua3MgZm9y IHNlbmQgdjMgcGF0Y2ggZm9yIHJrMzM5OSB2b3Agc3VwcG9ydC4KPj4+ID4KPj4+ID5CdXQgc29y cnkgZm9yIHRoYXQsIEkgaGFkIGNoYW5nZWQgbXkgbWluZCwgdGhvc2UgcGF0Y2hlcyBhcmUgZGVw cmVjYXRlZCwKPj4+ID5JIGhhdmUgbmV3IHJrMzM5OSBwYXRjaCBvbiBteSBkb3duc3RyZWFtIGtl cm5lbCwgSSB3aWxsIHVwc3RyZWFtIHNvb24uCj4+Cj4+IFd1dD8gSW1vIG1lcmdlIFNlYW4ncyBw YXRjaCBoZXJlLCBhbmQgdGhlbiByZWJhc2UgeW91ciBkb3duc3RyZWFtIHBhdGNoZXMKPj4gb24g dG9wIG9mIGl0LiBUaGF0IHlvdSBoYXZlIGEgZG93bnN0cmVhbSB0cmVlIHdoaWNoIGlzIG91dCBv ZiBzeW5jIHdpdGgKPj4gdXBzdHJlYW0gc2hvdWxkbid0IGJlIGEgcmVhc29uIHRvIHN0YWxsIHVw c3RyZWFtIGRldmVsb3BtZW50Lgo+PiAtRGFuaWVsCj4+Cj4gWWVhaCwgU29ycnkgZm9yIHRoYXQu Cj4KPiBJbiBmYWN0LCBvbiBteSBkb3duc3RyZWFtIGtlcm5lbCwgYWxzbyBoYXZlIHRob3NlIHBh dGNoZXMsIG15IG5ldyByazMzOTkKPiBwYXRjaGVzIGFyZSBiYXNlZCBvbiB0aGVtLAo+IGJ1dCB0 aGUgbmV3IHJrMzM5OSBwYXRjaGVzIHdpbGwgY292ZXIgdGhlIHRob3NlIHBhdGNoZXMsICBTZWFu J3MgcGF0Y2hlcyBpcwo+IG9sZCB2ZXJzaW9uLgo+Cj4gSSBqdXN0IHdhbnQgdG8gZmFzdCBmb3J3 YXJkLCBkb24ndCB3YW50IHRvIHNlbmQgdHdvIHZlcnNpb24gZHJpdmVycyB0bwo+IHVwc3RyZWFt Lgo+IGJ1dCBpZiB5b3UgYW5kIERhdmUgZmVlbCBvayBmb3IgdGhhdCwgSSBoYXZlIG5vIHByb2Js ZW06LSkgLgo+Cj4gbWVyZ2VkIFNlYW4ncyBwYXRjaGVzIGFuZCB0aGVuIGFwcGx5IG5ldyB2ZXJz aW9uIHBhdGNoZXMuCj4KCk9rLCBzbyBjYW4gSSBnZXQgYSByZXZpZXcvYWNrIGZvciB0aGVzZSBy ZXZpc2VkIHBhdGNoZXMgdGhlbj8KU29tZXRoaW5nIGlzIGJldHRlciB0aGFuIG5vdGhpbmcsIGFu ZCB0aGVyZSdzIGEgYnVuY2ggb2Ygc3R1ZmYgdGhhdApkZXBlbmRzIG9uIHRoZXNlIGNoYW5nZXMu CgpTZWFuCgoKPiBUaGFua3MuCj4KPiAtLQo+IO+8rWFyayBZYW8KPgo+Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCmRyaS1kZXZlbCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QK ZHJpLWRldmVsQGxpc3RzLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9wLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLmZyZWVkZXNrdG9w Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2RyaS1kZXZlbAo= From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: seanpaul@chromium.org (Sean Paul) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:30:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number In-Reply-To: <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> References: <1471454452-2151-1-git-send-email-seanpaul@chromium.org> <57B57AFE.2030706@rock-chips.com> <20160818091141.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao wrote: > On 2016?08?18? 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote: >>> >>> >Hi Sean >>> > >>> >Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support. >>> > >>> >But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are deprecated, >>> >I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon. >> >> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream patches >> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with >> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development. >> -Daniel >> > Yeah, Sorry for that. > > In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399 > patches are based on them, > but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches, Sean's patches is > old version. > > I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to > upstream. > but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) . > > merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches. > Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then? Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that depends on these changes. Sean > Thanks. > > -- > ?ark Yao > >