From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757941AbcHWNVI (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:21:08 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]:35192 "EHLO mail-yb0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbcHWNVG (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:21:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57BB9B87.2040406@rock-chips.com> References: <1471454452-2151-1-git-send-email-seanpaul@chromium.org> <57B57AFE.2030706@rock-chips.com> <20160818091141.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> <57BB9B87.2040406@rock-chips.com> From: Sean Paul Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:13:33 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number To: Mark yao Cc: Tomasz Figa , dri-devel , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id u7NDLDiR022861 On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Mark yao wrote: > On 2016年08月23日 04:30, Sean Paul wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao wrote: >>> >>> On 2016年08月18日 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sean >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support. >>>>>> >>>>>> But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are >>>>>> deprecated, >>>>>> I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon. >>>> >>>> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream >>>> patches >>>> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with >>>> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development. >>>> -Daniel >>>> >>> Yeah, Sorry for that. >>> >>> In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399 >>> patches are based on them, >>> but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches, Sean's patches >>> is >>> old version. >>> >>> I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to >>> upstream. >>> but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) . >>> >>> merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches. >>> >> Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then? >> Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that >> depends on these changes. >> >> Sean > > Yes, But I miss your [PATCH v3 0/5] and [PATCH v3 4/5]. do you mean the lost > patches use v2 version? > Yes, v2 4/5 was reviewed as-is, so I just applied it. Sean > >> >> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> Ｍark Yao >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Ｍark Yao > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Paul Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1471454452-2151-1-git-send-email-seanpaul@chromium.org> <57B57AFE.2030706@rock-chips.com> <20160818091141.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> <57BB9B87.2040406@rock-chips.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57BB9B87.2040406@rock-chips.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Mark yao Cc: Linux ARM Kernel , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel , Tomasz Figa List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org T24gTW9uLCBBdWcgMjIsIDIwMTYgYXQgODo0MCBQTSwgTWFyayB5YW8gPG1hcmsueWFvQHJvY2st Y2hpcHMuY29tPiB3cm90ZToKPiBPbiAyMDE25bm0MDjmnIgyM+aXpSAwNDozMCwgU2VhbiBQYXVs IHdyb3RlOgo+Pgo+PiBPbiBUaHUsIEF1ZyAxOCwgMjAxNiBhdCA2OjAyIEFNLCBNYXJrIHlhbyA8 bWFyay55YW9Acm9jay1jaGlwcy5jb20+IHdyb3RlOgo+Pj4KPj4+IE9uIDIwMTblubQwOOaciDE4 5pelIDE3OjExLCBEYW5pZWwgVmV0dGVyIHdyb3RlOgo+Pj4+Cj4+Pj4gT24gVGh1LCBBdWcgMTgs IDIwMTYgYXQgMDU6MDg6MTRQTSArMDgwMCwgTWFyayB5YW8gd3JvdGU6Cj4+Pj4+Pgo+Pj4+Pj4g SGkgU2Vhbgo+Pj4+Pj4KPj4+Pj4+IFRoYW5rcyBmb3Igc2VuZCB2MyBwYXRjaCBmb3IgcmszMzk5 IHZvcCBzdXBwb3J0Lgo+Pj4+Pj4KPj4+Pj4+IEJ1dCBzb3JyeSBmb3IgdGhhdCwgSSBoYWQgY2hh bmdlZCBteSBtaW5kLCB0aG9zZSBwYXRjaGVzIGFyZQo+Pj4+Pj4gZGVwcmVjYXRlZCwKPj4+Pj4+ IEkgaGF2ZSBuZXcgcmszMzk5IHBhdGNoIG9uIG15IGRvd25zdHJlYW0ga2VybmVsLCBJIHdpbGwg dXBzdHJlYW0gc29vbi4KPj4+Pgo+Pj4+IFd1dD8gSW1vIG1lcmdlIFNlYW4ncyBwYXRjaCBoZXJl LCBhbmQgdGhlbiByZWJhc2UgeW91ciBkb3duc3RyZWFtCj4+Pj4gcGF0Y2hlcwo+Pj4+IG9uIHRv cCBvZiBpdC4gVGhhdCB5b3UgaGF2ZSBhIGRvd25zdHJlYW0gdHJlZSB3aGljaCBpcyBvdXQgb2Yg c3luYyB3aXRoCj4+Pj4gdXBzdHJlYW0gc2hvdWxkbid0IGJlIGEgcmVhc29uIHRvIHN0YWxsIHVw c3RyZWFtIGRldmVsb3BtZW50Lgo+Pj4+IC1EYW5pZWwKPj4+Pgo+Pj4gWWVhaCwgU29ycnkgZm9y IHRoYXQuCj4+Pgo+Pj4gSW4gZmFjdCwgb24gbXkgZG93bnN0cmVhbSBrZXJuZWwsIGFsc28gaGF2 ZSB0aG9zZSBwYXRjaGVzLCBteSBuZXcgcmszMzk5Cj4+PiBwYXRjaGVzIGFyZSBiYXNlZCBvbiB0 aGVtLAo+Pj4gYnV0IHRoZSBuZXcgcmszMzk5IHBhdGNoZXMgd2lsbCBjb3ZlciB0aGUgdGhvc2Ug cGF0Y2hlcywgIFNlYW4ncyBwYXRjaGVzCj4+PiBpcwo+Pj4gb2xkIHZlcnNpb24uCj4+Pgo+Pj4g SSBqdXN0IHdhbnQgdG8gZmFzdCBmb3J3YXJkLCBkb24ndCB3YW50IHRvIHNlbmQgdHdvIHZlcnNp b24gZHJpdmVycyB0bwo+Pj4gdXBzdHJlYW0uCj4+PiBidXQgaWYgeW91IGFuZCBEYXZlIGZlZWwg b2sgZm9yIHRoYXQsIEkgaGF2ZSBubyBwcm9ibGVtOi0pIC4KPj4+Cj4+PiBtZXJnZWQgU2Vhbidz IHBhdGNoZXMgYW5kIHRoZW4gYXBwbHkgbmV3IHZlcnNpb24gcGF0Y2hlcy4KPj4+Cj4+IE9rLCBz byBjYW4gSSBnZXQgYSByZXZpZXcvYWNrIGZvciB0aGVzZSByZXZpc2VkIHBhdGNoZXMgdGhlbj8K Pj4gU29tZXRoaW5nIGlzIGJldHRlciB0aGFuIG5vdGhpbmcsIGFuZCB0aGVyZSdzIGEgYnVuY2gg b2Ygc3R1ZmYgdGhhdAo+PiBkZXBlbmRzIG9uIHRoZXNlIGNoYW5nZXMuCj4+Cj4+IFNlYW4KPgo+ IFllcywgQnV0IEkgbWlzcyB5b3VyIFtQQVRDSCB2MyAwLzVdIGFuZCBbUEFUQ0ggdjMgNC81XS4g ZG8geW91IG1lYW4gdGhlIGxvc3QKPiBwYXRjaGVzIHVzZSB2MiB2ZXJzaW9uPwo+CgpZZXMsIHYy IDQvNSB3YXMgcmV2aWV3ZWQgYXMtaXMsIHNvIEkganVzdCBhcHBsaWVkIGl0LgoKU2VhbgoKPgo+ Pgo+Pgo+Pj4gVGhhbmtzLgo+Pj4KPj4+IC0tCj4+PiDvvK1hcmsgWWFvCj4+Pgo+Pj4KPj4KPj4K Pgo+Cj4gLS0KPiDvvK1hcmsgWWFvCj4KPgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpkcmktZGV2ZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CmRyaS1kZXZlbEBsaXN0cy5m cmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0 aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: seanpaul@chromium.org (Sean Paul) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:13:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number In-Reply-To: <57BB9B87.2040406@rock-chips.com> References: <1471454452-2151-1-git-send-email-seanpaul@chromium.org> <57B57AFE.2030706@rock-chips.com> <20160818091141.GZ6232@phenom.ffwll.local> <57B587C0.5050007@rock-chips.com> <57BB9B87.2040406@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Mark yao wrote: > On 2016?08?23? 04:30, Sean Paul wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao wrote: >>> >>> On 2016?08?18? 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sean >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support. >>>>>> >>>>>> But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are >>>>>> deprecated, >>>>>> I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon. >>>> >>>> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream >>>> patches >>>> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with >>>> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development. >>>> -Daniel >>>> >>> Yeah, Sorry for that. >>> >>> In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399 >>> patches are based on them, >>> but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches, Sean's patches >>> is >>> old version. >>> >>> I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to >>> upstream. >>> but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) . >>> >>> merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches. >>> >> Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then? >> Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that >> depends on these changes. >> >> Sean > > Yes, But I miss your [PATCH v3 0/5] and [PATCH v3 4/5]. do you mean the lost > patches use v2 version? > Yes, v2 4/5 was reviewed as-is, so I just applied it. Sean > >> >> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> ?ark Yao >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > ?ark Yao > >