From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jianbo Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] eal/acl: enable acl for armv7-a Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:50:25 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1448995276-9599-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1449154976-16501-1-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <1449154976-16501-3-git-send-email-jianbo.liu@linaro.org> <5439330.ZDtZO93Tq2@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com (mail-vk0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A52F11F5 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 02:50:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by vkca188 with SMTP id a188so3498567vkc.0 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:50:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5439330.ZDtZO93Tq2@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 8 December 2015 at 09:18, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-03 23:02, Jianbo Liu: >> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64),y) >> +ifneq ($(filter y,$(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM) $(CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM64)),) > [...] >> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_ARM >> +/* NEON intrinsic vqtbl1q_u8() is not supported in ARMv7-A(AArch32) */ > > I'm convinced there is a good reason why ARMv8 is also called ARCH_ARM64, > and ARMv7 may be called AArch32 or ARCH_ARM. But I don't know why? > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/15/133 > Is ARCH_ARM32 or ARCH_ARMv7 too simple? > Is it possible to have a 32-bit ARMv8? Yes, ARMv8-R/M