From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: optimize enqueue
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:41:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAP4Qi3_DxAnvs0jX1P=G_PiLnRRbP5Wty-eU-OPE_81RGCAuTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1471319402-112998-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <1471585430-125925-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <e6addeba-ffbc-baae-61c8-5b8e798c843e@redhat.com>
 <CAP4Qi3-cSgHDPC3Wne3RSL0t=Z-vhYUPsPWH6VAXsXsHYX6ShQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B5581@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi39-KD8pY-3M31asoDV+dja27XzFTsBMq9ignoawdL8=HQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160922022903.GJ23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi392=aOMrSyTu-5qwpSLpwK-NVdHp-aztT-xT=BcRPWoew@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B5DAE@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi39YF6SoaiSaka0ioZFWb-2uzWZUbNP4CK7LqCQosaSmWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B5ED5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi39i4afVzycu+eBQqSXd2Smr7JpRA5QAWAFniVW__kUz6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B6204@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com (mail-yw0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.161.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7155922
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:41:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u82so110692338ywc.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B6204@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 23 September 2016 at 10:56, Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com> wrote:
.....
> This is expected because the 2nd patch is just a baseline and all optimization
> patches are organized in the rest of this patch set.
>
> I think you can do bottleneck analysis on ARM to see what's slowing down the
> perf, there might be some micro-arch complications there, mostly likely in
> memcpy.
>
> Do you use glibc's memcpy? I suggest to hand-crafted it on your own.
>
> Could you publish the mrg_rxbuf=on data also? Since it's more widely used
> in terms of spec integrity.
>
I don't think it will be helpful for you, considering the differences
between x86 and arm.
So please move on with this patchset...

Thanks!
Jianbo