Hi Arnd, Appreciate your comments On Mon, 23 May 2022 at 14:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:50 PM Tomer Maimon wrote: > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the Nuvoton > > Arbel NPCM8XX Board Management controller (BMC) SoC family. > > > > The Nuvoton Arbel NPCM8XX SoC is a fourth-generation BMC. > > The NPCM8XX computing subsystem comprises a quadcore ARM > > Cortex A35 ARM-V8 architecture. > > > > This patchset adds minimal architecture and drivers such as: > > Clocksource, Clock, Reset, and WD. > > > > Some of the Arbel NPCM8XX peripherals are based on Poleg NPCM7XX. > > > > This patchset was tested on the Arbel NPCM8XX evaluation board. > > Thanks for your submission. Please note a few things about the process > here: > > - The merge window is currently open, which means a lo > > Some of the Arbel NPCM8XX peripherals are based on Poleg NPCM7XX. > > This patchset was tested on the Arbel NPCM8XX evaluation board. > > Tomer Maimon (19): > dt-bindings: timer: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string > clocksource: timer-npcm7xx: Add NPCM845 timer support > dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add npcm845 compatible string > tty: serial: 8250: Add NPCM845 UART support > dt-bindings: watchdog: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string > watchdog: npcm_wdt: Add NPCM845 watchdog support > dt-binding: clk: npcm845: Add binding for Nuvoton NPCM8XX Clock > clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller > dt-bindings: reset: add syscon property > reset: npcm: using syscon instead of device data > dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX > reset: npcm: Add NPCM8XX support > dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add maintainer > dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 compatible string > dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 GCR compatible string > arm64: npcm: Add support for Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC > arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM8XX device tree > arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM845 EVB device tree > arm64: defconfig: Add Nuvoton NPCM family supportt of maintainers > won't be reviewing your patches at the moment. It may be better to wait > for the -rc1 to be out before sending out v2 > Will do. > > - don't send your patches to soc@kernel.org unless you want me to pick > them up into the soc tree and they have been reviewed already. The series > is clearly still under review at the moment, and I expect it to go > through > a few revisions first. > I will remove soc@kernel.org in the next patchset revision. > - gmail marked your emails as possible spam for me. I don't know what > happened here, but you may want to look into this to ensure that > everybody receives it. Unfortunately, this is happen because of the way we send the mail from our mail server. I double-check it our IT guys if there is a way to overcome it. > > Some of the Arbel NPCM8XX peripherals are based on Poleg NPCM7XX. > > This patchset was tested on the Arbel NPCM8XX evaluation board. > > Tomer Maimon (19): > dt-bindings: timer: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string > clocksource: timer-npcm7xx: Add NPCM845 timer support > dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add npcm845 compatible string > tty: serial: 8250: Add NPCM845 UART support > dt-bindings: watchdog: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string > watchdog: npcm_wdt: Add NPCM845 watchdog support > dt-binding: clk: npcm845: Add binding for Nuvoton NPCM8XX Clock > clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller > dt-bindings: reset: add syscon property > reset: npcm: using syscon instead of device data > dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX > reset: npcm: Add NPCM8XX support > dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add maintainer > dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 compatible string > dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 GCR compatible string > arm64: npcm: Add support for Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC > arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM8XX device tree > arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM845 EVB device tree > arm64: defconfig: Add Nuvoton NPCM family support > > - For an initial platform submission, I can merge the > clk/clocksource/serial/reset drivers along with the platform if they > have an Ack from the subsystem maintainers. I would normally > not include the watchdog patch in this as it's not essential, but > I suppose that it's fine if you only do a oneline change and it > has an Ack. If you have other nonessential drivers that need changes, > best submit them separately though. > Sure. > > Arnd > Best regards, Tomer