On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 06/05/2013 10:12 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:



On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com
<mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>> wrote:

    On 06/05/2013 09:32 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:


        On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com
        <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>
        <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com <mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com>>> wrote:

             You could just directly put the nativesdk-libx11 in place
        of the
             variable, no need to have the variable there.


        yes, that's what I had initially, but found it was less easy to
        read...
        with X11DEPENDS it's more 'obvious' that there is something
        special..
        that said, i can make the change if that's really needed.

    We do use the X11DEPENDS elsewhere when there are multiple
    dependencies, but I also found cases where we just include the
    dependency directly in the test. I was trying pick a direction:
    single entry no X11DEPENDS, multiple entries use X11DEPENDS.

    Comments, flames, ...


Yes; I sent this patch in Febuary:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/44759/

Please use this one instead of the recent one.


Well reading back on that, it looks like I was waiting for an EXTRA_OECONF or related change to the autoconf scripts.

Sau!

hmm. ok, sorry Otavio, i missed the other patch. I will check on my side too about EXTRA_OECONF.
 


--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750