From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.219.54]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UYGof-0001fc-51 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 16:18:33 +0200 Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j1so1643513oag.27 for ; Fri, 03 May 2013 07:00:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Hv2GI/Xrt2uKhw4t9KRTne+Z74jrIgt7uuDlCYC4Jdg=; b=cdR5fmDP3NxJQZRvGRSluwNtNUU4O1Pnh4phjNYcWGrFeFXGLG54fqA6rBXhwpqVfE fuDHYBcGiJoWDoW0kX72S2uuUhoqq9y44ukzIqRCvA2NJLWnj4fxoeC3putNidbwlD8a I5AgyhmEDb5LeMlgGUNhthOUsp5d0QO5C2GC922ExpKGLWcWb0FT8/QXdwRqgKUPiCVw u05SP2XyWGI1ZqQlLzkvp+LNwJPNSz5Ze4Lf0HJ1a3cy99B855d6sjtj9iEHVb/3i8y7 qa8TLwtTF6WpPtcQezrcUTNSJH6Tu6B8o+Iw1WCb9fMCVCayKlM3RquhJnWUNG1CG17a yWlA== X-Received: by 10.60.60.10 with SMTP id d10mr3000223oer.6.1367589633387; Fri, 03 May 2013 07:00:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.35.193 with HTTP; Fri, 3 May 2013 07:00:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1367008757-18667-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> <68356141.McDxtR3Bre@helios> <517BA9C6.6090707@balister.org> <1756231.MGNYtfpC2x@helios> From: Nicolas Dechesne Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 16:00:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLZ9gi9m1etS2LXF/su3c8Oy2XBZfx9c9yZAeNREu+uvDDc9coWRwJodMdD0Lwx6pogksw Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] smartmontools: import from OE classic X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 14:18:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: >>> > On Friday 26 April 2013 23:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >> And do you really need a .inc? >>> > >>> > Are we removing inc files if they were present in OE Classic? First I've >>> > heard if we are... >>> >>> If we are trying to reduce the number of versions of recipes we carry, >>> dropping .inc files would seem to be a good idea. I don't have strong >>> feelings, but it seems like something we should consider. >> >> I agree we should try to keep only one version of each recipe in software >> layers, however I figure it makes it easier for people to carry their own >> versions of recipes in distro layers (particularly older, which may be >> required in certain circumstances) if we do keep inc files where they already >> exist. > > I put the .inc in this patch, indeed because it was there in OE > Classic. I can update the patch if there is a consensus to remove the > .inc. > > also for the INC_PR, I added it, because I thought it makes sense for > .bb with .inc to have that. again, i can update the patch if you > recommend doing this way. > > thx hi, can you please let me know what I should do here? i can update the patch if needed, but not sure there is a clear consensus on what to do! nicolas