Richard, Steve, Anuj,


On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 11:28 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 11:08 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:03 AM Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 14:46 +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> > > It has been recentely mentioned to me by the YP TSC that a layer must
> > > not only pass the yocto-check-layer script, but also all its
> > > dependencies. These patches add support for testing dependencies
> > > automatically.
> > >
> > > Patch #1 and #3 are not much related, but improvements I made along
> > > the lines.
> > >
> > > Patch #2 split the internal function into 2 parts, so that we can get
> > > the list of dependencies from the main script.
> > >
> > > Patch #4 is where the processing of the dependencies is done. I chose
> > > to enable checking the dependencies by default, and use
> > > '--no-auto-dependency' to disable it, we could decide the other way
> > > around. For any dependency of the 'layers under test' we will simply
> > > add them to the list of layers to test unless they are already there.
> > >
> > > Here is a sample output with these changes:
> > >
> > > $ yocto-check-layer /work/oe/sources/meta-aws \
> > >                     --dependency /work/oe/sources/meta-openembedded/
> > >
> > > INFO: Summary of results:
> > > INFO:
> > > INFO: meta-aws ... PASS
> > > INFO: meta-python ... PASS
> > > INFO: meta-oe ... PASS
> > > INFO: meta-networking ... PASS
> >
> > We merged this but have started seeing:
> >
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/121/builds/166
> >
> > which seems a little strange and is probably related to this series.
> >
>
>
> yes, it's related.
>
> ...
> INFO: Adding meta-poky to the list of layers to test, as a dependency
> ...
> INFO: meta-poky ... SKIPPED (Layer under test should not present in BBLAYERS)
>
> With these changes, we are now adding all dependencies and trying to test them too. But meta-poky seems to
> be in bblayers.conf, and yocto-check-layer won't work since it needs to compute all checksum *without* the
> layer in the config first. 
>
> It is probably a good idea to make sure bblayers only has oe-core when we try to perform YP compat.
> Alternatively, as discussed, we use --no-auto-dependency on AB.. 

Fair enough, I'll update the config to do that.

These patches are now merged in master, and I believe they should be merged in dunfell and hardknott too. The 4 patches apply as-is in both branches. Let me know if you need anything from me!

 

Cheers,

Richard

>