From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B836AC43 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecvj10 with SMTP id vj10so58140736iec.0 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:56:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LPi8gx/e4ODmJHubpSEPUNUN9TXI3Xjb5EqFzcpqOO4=; b=wRwQGsw1PTuwafegDrJ0sNM18keZ6x/jrFAE1K12Gh/tJqdAoPbPGGpm85pbc7/VQK Z35SAisFiaHta8SDDOl2ZlEiyZdBuRNhUBRkSlAxagi6mHZhrspUV2yxKB4BH0OyqAAq 2I/jf1heGfYVEd7mhitBv1fbfLQOPT8JA2T2LxEQyRdIVOiYkSFcrexD/m73CJ0+wOFW jQFLWMkiOS/bZZI+BZpPzgWPCdjzfVWxKwKC7YLoSb2HrCNtifvTJx5vYteAatpC9/P0 epYjKCyGkllyIB8EuwZtReoUwSOqSdyzVFNbC1XPiwohVTMG3NTA//wbfibpJsAjBtZd rPow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.187.7 with SMTP id cu7mr24577156icb.71.1427198185684; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:56:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: otavio.salvador@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.133.21 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 04:56:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1427045315-13142-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:56:25 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 53a64X2ASaeCynNH6t8GdsRbrBs Message-ID: From: Otavio Salvador To: OpenEmbedded Devel List Cc: pnandyala , Zoltan Kuscsik , knagabhirava Subject: Re: meta-browser][PATCH V2] cef3: Add recipe for Chromium Embedded Framework X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 11:56:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Otavio Salvador > wrote: >> >> Couldn't it reuse the Chromium recipe we use? > > Surely and I have thought that for as second iteration after its soaked in > Right now they use different versions of chromium so there are some > issues around. > this will also mean some changes in chromium recipes. I'd prefer to do it once and avoid adding another recipe and handle same problems we had solved there. Also this allows for example the use of i.MX patches on meta-fsl-arm. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750