All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" <meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: i.MX6Q vs i.MX6UL tuning
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:20:23 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9ODKoOE2Fn+DtdvnMSGkMYMUPXGozbUwv2GvEa9zkrbcXepQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80282b74-4a74-e3b7-aafa-bc9a53a7d38c@mlbassoc.com>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
> I'm working with machines that have i.MX6Q/DL and i.MX6UL and noticed
> that they have quite different tuning.
>
> i.MX6Q:
>   TUNE_FEATURES     = "arm armv7a vfp thumb neon callconvention-hard
> cortexa9"
>   TARGET_FPU        = "hard"
>
> i.MX6UL:
>   TUNE_FEATURES     = "arm armv7ve vfp thumb neon cortexa7"
>   TARGET_FPU        = "softfp"
>
> I've not adjusted any GCC tuning for these targets.  Just wondering
> why the i.MX6Q is hardfp and the i.MX6UL is soft?  Anyone know why
> this choice was made?

I don't foresee any problem in using hardfp for UL.


-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750


  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-11 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-11  7:08 i.MX6Q vs i.MX6UL tuning Gary Thomas
2016-10-11 12:20 ` Otavio Salvador [this message]
2016-10-11 13:36   ` Lauren Post
2016-10-11 13:54     ` Otavio Salvador
2016-10-12  1:24       ` Gary Thomas
2016-10-12  1:35         ` Gary Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAP9ODKoOE2Fn+DtdvnMSGkMYMUPXGozbUwv2GvEa9zkrbcXepQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br \
    --cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.