From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com (mail-vk0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C2E6FF9F for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j189so74366151vkc.2 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:52:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ossystems-com-br.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hlwbESZnL3draJkeQO7dGOqi/3HT4ThVPozC0BvcOOw=; b=JhiJBOBbIV2VdJoHrTaVbuWB+PnVZXu1noBBYzIgIcY6l52XvXtr94nPKb7x/MunpX w8KM71pO1k1PWNEBm09us+uX7Wi95ttnIu8zh86zLrQYhZhntH82REtYzAIDhqt2Winl jSe3bfyH1hi+9AfPW0vN//V4otdyxlmZEl3gkzWBM8LpKeaDbmvEdGO83KzVbpt7B+Fa HCds74Cll2//ZaCzeQDFMbbfVS8whXqbs91i8QXiKcTvf/bmnn9aHwvE8iq7AkXfiwxg ipChsQTnk3s29qmMgIBS2LzDi1KnQyb2yZ0uIQDk3iJhmgJkPP0QdOKK1lq5LnzJlEIP Ixag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hlwbESZnL3draJkeQO7dGOqi/3HT4ThVPozC0BvcOOw=; b=HFxkqb5ku+A0kV7oJl0iU5TChCqtwoeckHbnS+QOpIeo4kBkkdceKpv6dY2EN2bsmo LxySK6v1J4JGAqPjYGNQPgNLJH024tSfHoJTIjhzsuNCERpjkqefF9kBs5nUU5bBfF+S CJz+AB2pxl9ZIETwghECsFbvbLPAah7tu/gowZZa/Tf13iW++OnmjoIgrvnhKj68V2kD pwEH2+5R91mZ5AA0Q8HWiUJqiS956i92UTeJa5nTx/PDr4PTa5biLdZr1N+Ven1/fuLI GoPPj1n3+659mkdGwQgytosMhBAL6G+ulFUjwc1JstO3h+XhB99+tkMEoXoWq0v8xEWh kL/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMoWYRZDxkD7+tekIs1FfibhHd4B34kUpH/bzsZhgBoTDt46bwiKdDXSxQUgqe25w== X-Received: by 10.31.4.85 with SMTP id 82mr23317113vke.155.1473105144073; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ua0-f170.google.com (mail-ua0-f170.google.com. [209.85.217.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m190sm1962315vke.7.2016.09.05.12.52.22 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:52:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Otavio Salvador X-Google-Original-From: Otavio Salvador Received: by mail-ua0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i32so237514222uai.2 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:52:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.176.64.161 with SMTP id i30mr18833683uad.107.1473105141728; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.154.68 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:52:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1a682b94-a0e2-cc93-92c3-f97e5abf4edd@denx.de> References: <20160904162130.13313-1-marex@denx.de> <1473024487.20226.3.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <9f3a5dfd-8303-b6d0-cd5e-07f2aac7c588@denx.de> <1473027091.20226.4.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <252ea4f7-871c-60a5-0a2f-f59a5d35683e@denx.de> <00e9ef55-2e08-5c92-0a5a-32e9ce1f61fa@denx.de> <1473073354.20226.9.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1fbc36ad-f031-9f85-7861-1ba302273ace@denx.de> <15ec9cec-d76f-233e-486a-89afb93083de@denx.de> <1473104036.20226.16.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1a682b94-a0e2-cc93-92c3-f97e5abf4edd@denx.de> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 16:52:20 -0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Marek Vasut Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] u-boot: Factor out common bits X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 19:52:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 13:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> >>>> On 09/05/2016 06:22 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Marek Vasut >>>>> wrote: >>>>> I would love to see the proposed patches. >>>>> >>>> That'd depend on whether they'd be NAK'd right away for breaking >>>> BSPs or >>>> not. >>> It will depends on the type of breakage and the benefits it puts on >>> the table. >> >> I would note that we are past feature freeze at this point and I'm >> struggling to get stability in the patches we have queued without >> anything in addition to that. >> >> If there is a pressing attractive reason we should do this now I'm >> willing to listen but it might be better waiting for 2.3... > > Definitely wait for 2.3 with any disruptive changes please. > > U-Boot 2016.09 will be out on september 12th, but I don't know if that > can make it into 2.2 release. I can certainly send a patch to update > the recipe. I would support its addition; the risk of it is small and the set of reference BSP is also small so should be fine. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750